Suppr超能文献

人格障碍中情感调节和客体关系质量的评估工具:对初始治疗参与度的预测影响。

Assessment tools for affect regulation and quality of object relations in personality disorders: The predictive impact on initial treatment engagement.

作者信息

Loeffler-Stastka Henriette, Blueml Victor

机构信息

Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Bull Menninger Clin. 2010 Winter;74(1):29-44. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2010.74.1.29.

Abstract

On the road to DSM-V, instruments are demanded that provide clinically meaningful information, for example, predictions about psychotherapy utilization. Comparison of five different instruments in a sample of 297 patients with personality disorders showed that the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV (SCID), SWAP-200, and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) lead to predictive models concerning initial therapy engagement. The Affect Experience and Affect Regulation Q-sort (AREQ) provided information concerning therapy rejection. The findings point to the importance of interpersonal, affective, and psycho-structural functioning in the diagnostic procedure of personality disorders.

摘要

在通往《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)的道路上,需要能提供具有临床意义信息的工具,例如关于心理治疗利用情况的预测。在297名人格障碍患者样本中对五种不同工具进行比较,结果显示《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的结构化临床访谈(SCID)、200项社会交往与个性问题量表(SWAP-200)以及人际问题清单(IIP)能得出有关初始治疗参与度的预测模型。情感体验与情感调节Q分类法(AREQ)提供了有关治疗拒绝情况的信息。研究结果表明人际、情感和心理结构功能在人格障碍诊断过程中的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验