• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格因素及其对治疗利用的预测影响的探索:外显功能模式。

Exploration of personality factors and their predictive impact on therapy utilization: the externalizing mode of functioning.

机构信息

Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2010 May;20(3):295-308. doi: 10.1080/10503300903436710.

DOI:10.1080/10503300903436710
PMID:20099205
Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify personality factors predicting psychotherapy utilization on the basis of personality pathology, affect regulation and interpersonal functioning. The authors assessed affectivity (using the Affect Experience and Affect Regulation Q-Sort), interpersonal context (using the Quality of Object Relations Scale), and character pathology (using the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-200). Combination of instruments showed one stable factor predictive for nonengagement in psychotherapy, revealing an externalizing personality dimension, dominated by externalizing defenses, acting out, deficient superego functions, and impairment in reflective functioning and in relating to others. Stability of the predictive power of this personality factor for therapy engagement could be shown, and replication in two other samples confirmed the findings. The results highlight the importance of measuring affect-regulatory mechanisms, and clinical implications for intervention techniques are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在基于人格病理学、情绪调节和人际功能,确定预测心理治疗利用的人格因素。作者评估了情感(使用情感体验和情感调节 Q 分类法)、人际环境(使用客体关系质量量表)和人格病理学(使用谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序-200)。这些工具的组合显示了一个稳定的因素,可预测不参与心理治疗,揭示了一种外化的人格维度,以外化防御、行为不当、超我功能缺陷以及在反思功能和与他人的关系方面受损为特征。这种人格因素对治疗参与的预测能力的稳定性可以得到证明,在另外两个样本中的复制也证实了这些发现。研究结果强调了测量情绪调节机制的重要性,并讨论了干预技术的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Exploration of personality factors and their predictive impact on therapy utilization: the externalizing mode of functioning.人格因素及其对治疗利用的预测影响的探索:外显功能模式。
Psychother Res. 2010 May;20(3):295-308. doi: 10.1080/10503300903436710.
2
Utilization of psychotherapy in patients with personality disorder: the impact of gender, character traits, affect regulation, and quality of object-relations.人格障碍患者心理治疗的应用:性别、性格特征、情感调节和客体关系质量的影响。
Psychol Psychother. 2005 Dec;78(Pt 4):531-48. doi: 10.1348/147608305X42217.
3
Assessment tools for affect regulation and quality of object relations in personality disorders: The predictive impact on initial treatment engagement.人格障碍中情感调节和客体关系质量的评估工具:对初始治疗参与度的预测影响。
Bull Menninger Clin. 2010 Winter;74(1):29-44. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2010.74.1.29.
4
Preparing for DSM 5 - assessment of personality pathology during psychoanalytic and psychiatric treatments.准备 DSM-5 - 精神分析和精神治疗中的人格病理学评估。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011 May;123(9-10):276-84. doi: 10.1007/s00508-011-1552-0. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
5
[Predictive power on therapy engagement in personality disorders: SWAP- 200 versus SCID-II].[人格障碍治疗参与度的预测能力:SWAP-200与SCID-II对比]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(9-10):342-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1238299. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
6
[Use of Q-sort assessment methods for diagnostic purposes and in treatment evaluation?].[将Q分类评估方法用于诊断目的及治疗评估?]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2011;57(4):319-24. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2011.57.4.319.
7
Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.使用SWAP-200和PAI对人格障碍进行临床医生评估与自我评估之间的关系。
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):225-9. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.225.
8
[Referral success to psychotherapy of patients with personality disorders - therapeutic consequences].[人格障碍患者心理治疗的转诊成功率 - 治疗结果]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Mar;122(5-6):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1353-x.
9
Client attachment to therapist: Relation to client personality and symptomatology, and their contributions to the therapeutic alliance.来访者对治疗师的依恋:与来访者人格和症状的关系,以及它们对治疗联盟的贡献。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Dec;47(4):454-68. doi: 10.1037/a0022079.
10
Clinical assessment of attachment patterns and personality disorder in adolescents and adults.青少年和成年人依恋模式与人格障碍的临床评估
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1065-85. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1065.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of high-intensity versus low-intensity psychoanalytically oriented long-term treatments and determinants of outcome: individual participant data Meta-analysis of Long-term Analytic treatment Studies (MeLAS).高强度与低强度精神分析导向的长期治疗的疗效及结局的决定因素:长期精神分析治疗研究(MeLAS)的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 19;13(7):e069332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069332.
2
Personalized treatment - which interaction ingredients should be focused to capture the unconscious.个性化治疗——应聚焦哪些相互作用因素以捕捉潜意识。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Mar 6;10(7):2053-2062. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2053.
3
Affect regulation in psychoanalytic treatments of patients with a borderline personality disorder-psychoanalysis and psychodynamic psychotherapy-a comparison.
边缘型人格障碍患者精神分析治疗中的情感调节——精神分析与精神动力心理治疗——一项比较
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 19;11(12):1328-1345. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1328.
4
Construct Validity of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) Within a Mixed Psychiatric Sample.心理化量表(MentS)在混合精神科样本中的结构效度。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:608214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608214. eCollection 2021.