Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):809-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
To determine the risk factors, percentage and maternal and perinatal complications of uterine rupture after previous caesarean section.
Population-based registry study.
Mothers with births > or =28 weeks of gestation after previous caesarean section (n = 18 794), registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2005.
Associations of uterine rupture with risk factors, maternal and perinatal outcome were estimated using cross-tabulations and logistic regression.
Odds of uterine rupture.
A total of 94 uterine ruptures were identified (5.0/1000 mothers). Compared with elective prelabour caesarean section, odds of rupture increased for emergency prelabour caesarean section (OR: 8.63; 95% CI: 2.6-28.0), spontaneous labour (OR: 6.65; 95% CI: 2.4-18.6) and induced labour (OR: 12.60; 95% CI: 4.4-36.4). The odds were increased for maternal age > or =40 years versus <30 years (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.1-5.5), non-Western (mothers born outside Europe, North America or Australia) origin (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.8-4.7) and gestational age > or =41 weeks versus 37-40 weeks (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7). Uterine rupture after trial of labour significantly increased severe postpartum haemorrhage (OR: 8.51; 95% CI: 4.6-15.1), general anaesthesia exposure (OR: 14.20; 95% CI: 9.1-22.2), hysterectomy (OR: 51.36; 95% CI: 13.6-193.4) and serious perinatal outcome (OR: 24.51 (95% CI: 11.9-51.9). Induction by prostaglandins significantly increased the odds for uterine rupture compared with spontaneous labour (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.6-4.7). Prelabour ruptures occurred after latent uterine activity or abdominal pain in mothers with multiple or uncommon uterine scars.
Trial of labour carried greater risk and graver outcome of uterine rupture than elective repeated caesarean section, although absolute risks were low. A review of labour management and induction protocol is needed.
确定既往剖宫产术后子宫破裂的风险因素、发生率以及母婴围生期并发症。
基于人群的注册研究。
1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 6 月 30 日期间,在挪威医学出生登记处登记的既往剖宫产术后分娩(妊娠 28 周及以上)的母亲(n=18794)。
使用交叉表和逻辑回归分析子宫破裂与危险因素、母婴围生期结局的关系。
子宫破裂的比值比(OR)。
共发现 94 例子宫破裂(5.0/1000 例母亲)。与择期术前剖宫产相比,急诊术前剖宫产(OR:8.63;95%可信区间:2.6-28.0)、自发性分娩(OR:6.65;95%可信区间:2.4-18.6)和诱导分娩(OR:12.60;95%可信区间:4.4-36.4)发生子宫破裂的风险更高。与年龄<30 岁相比,年龄≥40 岁(OR:2.48;95%可信区间:1.1-5.5)、非西方(母亲出生于欧洲、北美或澳大利亚以外地区)(OR:2.87;95%可信区间:1.8-4.7)和孕龄≥41 周与 37-40 周相比(OR:1.73;95%可信区间:1.1-2.7)发生子宫破裂的风险更高。试产失败后,严重产后出血(OR:8.51;95%可信区间:4.6-15.1)、全身麻醉(OR:14.20;95%可信区间:9.1-22.2)、子宫切除术(OR:51.36;95%可信区间:13.6-193.4)和严重围生期结局(OR:24.51;95%可信区间:11.9-51.9)的风险显著增加。与自发性分娩相比,前列腺素诱导分娩(OR:2.72;95%可信区间:1.6-4.7)增加了子宫破裂的风险。术前子宫破裂发生于多胎或子宫瘢痕不常见的产妇隐匿性子宫活动或腹痛之后。
与择期再次剖宫产相比,试产具有更大的子宫破裂风险和更严重的母婴围生期结局,尽管绝对风险较低。需要对分娩管理和引产方案进行审查。