Suppr超能文献

针对卫生工作者的预防性员工支持干预措施。

Preventive staff-support interventions for health workers.

作者信息

van Wyk Brian E, Pillay-Van Wyk Victoria

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Modderdam Road, Bellville, South Africa, 7535.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD003541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003541.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers need to be supported to maintain sufficient levels of motivation and productivity, and to prevent the debilitating effects of stress on mental and physical well-being.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of preventive staff-support interventions to healthcare workers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) Specialised Register (and the database of studies awaiting assessment), Biblioweb (searched 28 August 2008); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3) (searched 28 August 2008); MEDLINE, Ovid 1950 to August Week 2 2008 (searched 26 August 2008); CINAHL, Ovid 1982 to August Week 4 2008 (searched 26 August 2008); EMBASE, Ovid 1980 to 2008 Week 34 (searched 26 August 2008); PsycINFO, Ovid 1806 to July Week 5 2008 (searched 27 August 2008); Soc iological Abstracts, CBA 1952 to present (searched 28 August 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of interventions to support healthcare workers in coping with work-related stress, preventing burnout and improving job satisfaction, without changing contractual conditions of service or physical work environment. Three types of interventions were included in this review: (1) support groups for staff; (2) training in stress management techniques; and (3) management interventions for supporting staff.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed study selection, quality assessments and data abstraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies involving 716 participants met the criteria for inclusion. None assessed the effects of support groups for health workers. Eight studies assessed the effects of training interventions in various stress management techniques on measures of stress and/or job satisfaction, and two studies assessed the effects of management interventions on stress, job satisfaction and absenteeism.Three studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of stress management training intervention on job stress. Only one of these showed that this effect is sustainable over the medium-term. One study demonstrated the beneficial effect of a high intensity, stress management training intervention on burnout. Low and moderate intensity stress management training interventions failed to demonstrate benefit on burnout or staff satisfaction.Management interventions demonstrated increases in job satisfaction, but failed to show effect on absenteeism.Most studies had several methodological shortcomings leaving them vulnerable to potential biases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of stress management training interventions to reduce job stress and prevent burnout among healthcare workers beyond the intervention period. Low quality evidence suggests that longer-term interventions with refresher or booster sessions may have more sustained positive effect, but this needs to be rigorously evaluated in further trials.Low quality evidence exists to show that management interventions may improve some measures of job satisfaction. However, further trials are needed to assess whether this finding is replicable in other settings. There was insufficient evidence of the benefit of management interventions on staff absenteeism.Rigorous trials are needed to assess the effects of longer-term stress management training and management interventions in primary care and developing country settings.

摘要

背景

医护人员需要得到支持,以维持足够的动力和工作效率,并防止压力对身心健康产生不利影响。

目的

评估预防性员工支持干预措施对医护人员的影响。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane有效实践与护理组织小组(EPOC)专业注册库(以及待评估研究数据库)、Biblioweb(于2008年8月28日检索);Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2008年第3期)(于2008年8月28日检索);MEDLINE,Ovid数据库,1950年至2008年8月第2周(于2008年8月26日检索);CINAHL,Ovid数据库,1982年至2008年8月第4周(于2008年8月26日检索);EMBASE,Ovid数据库,1980年至2008年第34周(于2008年8月26日检索);PsycINFO,Ovid数据库,1806年至2008年7月第5周(于2008年8月27日检索);社会学文摘数据库,CBA数据库,1952年至今(于2008年8月28日检索)。

入选标准

关于支持医护人员应对工作相关压力、预防职业倦怠和提高工作满意度的干预措施的随机对照试验,且不改变服务合同条件或工作物理环境。本综述纳入了三种类型的干预措施:(1)员工支持小组;(2)压力管理技巧培训;(3)支持员工的管理干预措施。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立进行研究筛选、质量评估和数据提取。

主要结果

十项涉及716名参与者的研究符合纳入标准。没有研究评估医护人员支持小组的效果。八项研究评估了各种压力管理技巧培训干预措施对压力和/或工作满意度指标的影响,两项研究评估了管理干预措施对压力、工作满意度和旷工率的影响。三项研究证明压力管理培训干预措施对工作压力有有益影响。其中只有一项研究表明这种影响在中期是可持续的。一项研究证明高强度压力管理培训干预措施对职业倦怠有有益影响。低强度和中等强度压力管理培训干预措施未能证明对职业倦怠或员工满意度有有益影响。管理干预措施表明工作满意度有所提高,但未显示对旷工率有影响。大多数研究存在几个方法学上的缺陷,容易受到潜在偏差的影响。

作者结论

没有足够证据证明压力管理培训干预措施在干预期之外能有效减轻医护人员的工作压力和预防职业倦怠。低质量证据表明,进行复习或强化课程的长期干预措施可能有更持久的积极效果,但这需要在进一步试验中进行严格评估。存在低质量证据表明管理干预措施可能会改善一些工作满意度指标。然而,需要进一步试验来评估这一发现是否能在其他环境中得到重复验证。没有足够证据证明管理干预措施对员工旷工率有有益影响。需要进行严格试验来评估长期压力管理培训和管理干预措施在初级保健和发展中国家环境中的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验