Pohl M A, Lan S P, Berl T
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Jun 1;114(11):924-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-924.
To determine whether plasmapheresis increases the risk for infection in immunosuppressed patients.
Randomized, controlled trial.
Multicenter.
Eighty-six patients enrolled in a trial of plasmapheresis for severe diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.
Forty-six of the patients received high-dose steroid therapy plus cyclophosphamide therapy for 8 weeks. Thereafter, cyclophosphamide therapy was discontinued, and steroid therapy was tapered (standard treatment group). Forty patients received identical treatment and had 12 plasmapheresis procedures during the first 4 weeks of the treatment.
Patients were examined for the development of infection.
No statistical difference in age, sex, race, serum creatinine level, proteinuria, or complement levels was found between the two groups. Over a follow-up period of 5376 patient-weeks, 74% of patients in the standard treatment group had 62 infections, yielding an aggregate infection rate of 1.15 infections per 100 weeks (median individual infection rate, 1.08; 25th and 75th percentiles, 0.0 and 2.44). This rate was comparable to that seen in the plasmapheresis-treated patients who were followed for 4187 patient-weeks: 68% had 51 infections, for an aggregate infection rate of 1.22 infections per 100 weeks (median individual infection rate, 0.94; 25th and 75th percentiles, 0.0 and 2.32). The infection rate was also comparable in the initial acute phase of the study, despite the fact that patients who received plasmapheresis then had significantly lower immunoglobulin (IgG) levels (P less than 0.001). Neither the site (superficial compared with systemic) nor the nature (conventional compared with unconventional) of infection differed statistically between the two groups. Of 14 patient deaths, 7 were from infection (4 in control group and 3 in the plasmapheresis group).
Plasmapheresis did not increase the risk for infection in immunosuppressed patients with severe lupus nephritis.
确定血浆置换是否会增加免疫抑制患者的感染风险。
随机对照试验。
多中心。
86名参与重度弥漫性增殖性狼疮性肾炎血浆置换试验的患者。
46名患者接受高剂量类固醇疗法加环磷酰胺疗法,为期8周。此后,停用环磷酰胺疗法,逐渐减少类固醇疗法(标准治疗组)。40名患者接受相同治疗,并在治疗的前4周内进行了12次血浆置换程序。
检查患者是否发生感染。
两组在年龄、性别、种族、血清肌酐水平、蛋白尿或补体水平方面未发现统计学差异。在为期5376患者周的随访期内,标准治疗组74%的患者发生了62次感染,总感染率为每100周1.15次感染(个体感染率中位数为1.08;第25和75百分位数分别为0.0和2.44)。该比率与接受血浆置换治疗的患者在4187患者周的随访中观察到的比率相当:68%的患者发生了51次感染,总感染率为每100周1.22次感染(个体感染率中位数为0.94;第25和75百分位数分别为0.0和2.32)。尽管当时接受血浆置换的患者免疫球蛋白(IgG)水平显著较低(P<0.001),但在研究的初始急性期感染率也相当。两组在感染部位(浅表性与全身性)或感染性质(传统性与非传统性)方面均无统计学差异。在14例患者死亡中,7例死于感染(对照组4例,血浆置换组3例)。
血浆置换不会增加重度狼疮性肾炎免疫抑制患者的感染风险。