Suppr超能文献

[根治性颈清扫术与改良颈清扫术。癌症相关及功能观点]

[Radical versus modified neck dissection. Cancer-related and functional viewpoints].

作者信息

Mann W, Wolfensberger M, Füller U, Beck C

机构信息

Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Mainz.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 1991 Jan;70(1):32-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997980.

Abstract

In a retrospective study 256 cases with curative or prophylactic neck dissection were evaluated with regard to neck recurrence and survival. In 173 cases the spinal accessory nerve had been preserved, in the remaining 86 cases it had been sacrificed. The results demonstrate that preservation of the accessory nerve has no influence on the regional recurrence rate and on survival if preservation of the nerve is possible without compromising the radicality of the neck dissection and if the patient is subjected to post-operative radiation.

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对256例行根治性或预防性颈部清扫术的病例进行了颈部复发和生存情况评估。173例保留了副神经,其余86例牺牲了副神经。结果表明,如果在不影响颈部清扫术根治性的情况下能够保留副神经,并且患者接受术后放疗,那么保留副神经对局部复发率和生存率没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验