Suppr超能文献

[根治性颈清扫术与改良颈清扫术。癌症相关及功能观点]

[Radical versus modified neck dissection. Cancer-related and functional viewpoints].

作者信息

Mann W, Wolfensberger M, Füller U, Beck C

机构信息

Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Mainz.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 1991 Jan;70(1):32-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997980.

Abstract

In a retrospective study 256 cases with curative or prophylactic neck dissection were evaluated with regard to neck recurrence and survival. In 173 cases the spinal accessory nerve had been preserved, in the remaining 86 cases it had been sacrificed. The results demonstrate that preservation of the accessory nerve has no influence on the regional recurrence rate and on survival if preservation of the nerve is possible without compromising the radicality of the neck dissection and if the patient is subjected to post-operative radiation.

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对256例行根治性或预防性颈部清扫术的病例进行了颈部复发和生存情况评估。173例保留了副神经,其余86例牺牲了副神经。结果表明,如果在不影响颈部清扫术根治性的情况下能够保留副神经,并且患者接受术后放疗,那么保留副神经对局部复发率和生存率没有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验