• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾功能不全患者中对比剂所致肾毒性:离子型对比剂与非离子型对比剂的比较

Nephrotoxicity from contrast material in renal insufficiency: ionic versus nonionic agents.

作者信息

Harris K G, Smith T P, Cragg A H, Lemke J H

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Radiology. 1991 Jun;179(3):849-52. doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.2028004.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.179.3.2028004
PMID:2028004
Abstract

Controversy exists over whether use of low-osmolality contrast agents is of any benefit in mitigating the risk of contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity (CN) in patients with impaired renal function. To test this hypothesis, 101 adult inpatients with high serum creatinine levels (range, 1.4-2.4 mg/dL [120-210 mumol/L]) undergoing contrast material-enhanced computed tomography were randomized to receive ionic or nonionic (low-osmolality) contrast agents in a uniform dose. Changes in serum creatinine level at 48 hours were measured. Seven (14%) of the 50 patients receiving ionic contrast media experienced an increase of 25% or more in serum creatinine level. Only one (2%) of the 51 patients receiving nonionic contrast agents experienced such an increase, a statistically significant difference (P less than .05). In the subset of 25 diabetic patients, the difference was of a similar magnitude. These data suggest that ionic contrast media are more likely than nonionic contrast agents to cause mild exacerbation of renal insufficiency when given intravenously. However, there were no cases of clinically important CN in the study.

摘要

对于使用低渗性造影剂是否有助于降低肾功能受损患者发生造影剂诱导的肾毒性(CN)风险,目前仍存在争议。为了验证这一假设,对101例血清肌酐水平较高(范围为1.4 - 2.4 mg/dL [120 - 210 μmol/L])且正在接受造影剂增强计算机断层扫描的成年住院患者进行随机分组,使其接受相同剂量的离子型或非离子型(低渗性)造影剂。测量48小时时血清肌酐水平的变化。接受离子型造影剂的50例患者中有7例(14%)血清肌酐水平升高了25%或更多。接受非离子型造影剂的51例患者中只有1例(2%)出现了这种升高,差异具有统计学意义(P小于0.05)。在25例糖尿病患者亚组中,差异幅度相似。这些数据表明,静脉注射时,离子型造影剂比非离子型造影剂更有可能导致肾功能不全轻度加重。然而,该研究中没有发生具有临床意义的CN病例。

相似文献

1
Nephrotoxicity from contrast material in renal insufficiency: ionic versus nonionic agents.肾功能不全患者中对比剂所致肾毒性:离子型对比剂与非离子型对比剂的比较
Radiology. 1991 Jun;179(3):849-52. doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.2028004.
2
Effect of theophylline on contrast material-nephropathy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: controlled, randomized, double-blinded study.茶碱对慢性肾功能不全患者造影剂肾病的影响:对照、随机、双盲研究。
Radiology. 2002 Jun;223(3):772-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2233010609.
3
Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent.
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 19;320(3):149-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901193200304.
4
Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
Radiology. 1993 Jan;186(1):183-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416561.
5
Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study.
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 19;320(3):143-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901193200303.
6
Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial.
Radiology. 1992 Mar;182(3):649-55. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535876.
7
A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.心脏导管插入术期间非离子型低渗性造影剂与离子型高渗性造影剂的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):431-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260702.
8
Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: high versus low osmolar media.肾功能受损患者的对比剂肾病:高渗与低渗造影剂
Kidney Int. 1992 May;41(5):1274-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.1992.189.
9
Frequency and determinants of adverse reactions induced by high-osmolality contrast media.高渗性造影剂所致不良反应的发生率及决定因素
Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 1):727-32. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.3.2916027.
10
Contrast nephropathy in high-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention.接受冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的高危患者中的对比剂肾病
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Dec;15(12):791-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention methods; a systematic review and network meta-analysis.对比剂相关急性肾损伤预防方法的有效性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Nov 13;19(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1113-0.
2
[What is reliable in prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy?].
Med Klin (Munich). 1997 Jun 15;92(6):329-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03044773.