• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与软组织肉瘤患者的生存率：意大利北部一项基于人群的研究

Socioeconomic status and survival from soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based study in northern Italy.

作者信息

Ciccone G, Magnani C, Delsedime L, Vineis P

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):747-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.747.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.81.6.747
PMID:2029044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1405155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Differential prognosis among cancer patients according to socioeconomic status (SES) has been reported. We analyzed survival from soft tissue sarcomas (STS) according to different SES indicators.

METHODS

We followed up all the adult patients with a new diagnosis of STS occurring between 1.1.1981 and 31.12.1983 in an area of Northern Italy (N = 86).

RESULTS

The overall three-year survival rate was 57 percent. After adjustment for confounders, both low education and blue collar jobs were negatively associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that patients of low SES have a poorer prognosis for STS.

摘要

背景与目的

据报道，癌症患者的预后因社会经济地位（SES）而异。我们根据不同的SES指标分析了软组织肉瘤（STS）患者的生存率。

方法

我们对1981年1月1日至1983年12月31日期间在意大利北部某地区新诊断为STS的所有成年患者进行了随访（N = 86）。

结果

总体三年生存率为57%。在对混杂因素进行调整后，低教育水平和蓝领工作均与生存率呈负相关。

结论

结果表明，SES较低的患者STS预后较差。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and survival from soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based study in northern Italy.社会经济地位与软组织肉瘤患者的生存率：意大利北部一项基于人群的研究
Am J Public Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):747-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.747.
2
Validation of Different Nutritional Assessment Tools in Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Soft Tissue Spindle-Cell Sarcomas.不同营养评估工具预测软组织梭形细胞肉瘤患者预后的验证。
Nutrients. 2018 Jun 13;10(6):765. doi: 10.3390/nu10060765.
3
Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system.使用三级系统对预测肢体软组织肉瘤患者生存率的列线图进行验证和调整。
Cancer. 2005 Jan 15;103(2):402-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20778.
4
Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2,084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas.2084例局限性原发性成人软组织肉瘤的微观切缘预后意义分析。
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):424-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00015.
5
Bone versus soft-tissue sarcomas in the elderly.老年人的骨肉瘤与软组织肉瘤
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Apr;18(1):58-62. doi: 10.1177/230949901001800113.
6
Can Multistate Modeling of Local Recurrence, Distant Metastasis, and Death Improve the Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcomas?局部复发、远处转移和死亡的多状态模型能否改善软组织肉瘤患者结局的预测？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1427-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5232-x. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Evaluation of newer prognostic markers for adult soft tissue sarcomas.成人软组织肉瘤新型预后标志物的评估
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Oct;15(10):3249-57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.10.3249.
8
Localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma: improved knowledge with unchanged survival over time.局限性肢体软组织肉瘤：随着时间推移，认识有所提高，但生存率未变。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2719-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.026.
9
Race is an independent predictor of survival in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.种族是四肢软组织肉瘤患者生存的独立预测因子。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4397-3.
10
Necrosis on FDG PET/CT correlates with prognosis and mortality in sarcomas.FDG PET/CT 中的坏死与肉瘤的预后和死亡率相关。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):170-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9795.

引用本文的文献

1
Socio-economic factors do not affect overall survival in soft tissue sarcoma when patients treated at a single high-volume center.当患者在单一高容量中心接受治疗时，社会经济因素不会影响软组织肉瘤的总生存率。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 27;21(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08352-z.
2
An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.癌症生存率的国际比较：安大略省多伦多市和密歇根州底特律市的大都市区。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1156-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1156.

本文引用的文献

1
Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system.成人软组织肉瘤；病理预后变量研究及组织病理学分级系统的定义
Int J Cancer. 1984 Jan 15;33(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910330108.
2
Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States.美国不同种族癌症患者的生存率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984 Aug;73(2):341-52. doi: 10.1093/jnci/73.2.341.
3
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.生存数据的评估以及在考虑过程中出现的两个新的排序统计量。
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70.
4
Survival of cancer patients by economic status in a free care setting.在免费医疗环境下按经济状况划分的癌症患者生存率
Cancer. 1985 Apr 1;55(7):1552-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850401)55:7<1552::aid-cncr2820550723>3.0.co;2-e.
5
Phenoxy herbicides and soft-tissue sarcomas in female rice weeders. A population-based case-referent study.女性稻田除草工中的苯氧基除草剂与软组织肉瘤。一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Feb;13(1):9-17. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2077.
6
Cancer survival and social class in Sweden.瑞典的癌症生存率与社会阶层
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Sep;41(3):204-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.3.204.
7
Multivariate analysis for clinical prognostic factors in 163 patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
Cancer. 1988 Oct 1;62(7):1444-50. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881001)62:7<1444::aid-cncr2820620733>3.0.co;2-l.
8
Prognostication in soft tissue sarcoma. A model with four risk factors.
Cancer. 1988 Feb 15;61(4):817-23. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<817::aid-cncr2820610429>3.0.co;2-9.
9
Economic status and survival of cancer patients.癌症患者的经济状况与生存情况
Cancer. 1977 Feb;39(2):467-77. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<467::aid-cncr2820390215>3.0.co;2-b.