• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酗酒研究中的可疑方法。

Questionable methods in alcoholism research.

作者信息

Koocher G P

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):246-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.59.2.246.

DOI:10.1037/0022-006x.59.2.246
PMID:2030183
Abstract

Alcoholism research paradigms that use substantial cash incentives to attract participants and that call for inducing alcoholics to consume ethanol in the laboratory raise significant ethical questions. Nonalcoholic family members observing such study methods may also suffer subtle emotional anguish by virtue of their participation. When using such questionable methods, investigators should be obligated to discuss their risk-benefit rationales and detail their precautionary behaviors to protect participants. Discussion of these ethical problems should be mandatory in any publications resulting from such research paradigms.

摘要

酗酒研究范式使用大量现金奖励来吸引参与者,并要求在实验室中诱导酗酒者饮用乙醇,这引发了重大的伦理问题。观察此类研究方法的非酗酒家庭成员也可能因其参与而遭受微妙的情感痛苦。当使用此类有问题的方法时,研究人员有义务讨论其风险效益依据,并详细说明其保护参与者的预防措施。在由此类研究范式产生的任何出版物中,都应强制讨论这些伦理问题。

相似文献

1
Questionable methods in alcoholism research.酗酒研究中的可疑方法。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):246-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.59.2.246.
2
Experimental drinking procedures in the study of alcoholics and their families: a consideration of ethical issues.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):249-55.
3
Ethical concerns in alcohol research.酒精研究中的伦理问题。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):256-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.256.
4
Ethical considerations of alcohol administration in human research studies.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Dec;17(6):1345-6.
5
Validity of children's reports of parental alcohol abuse.儿童关于父母酗酒情况报告的有效性。
J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Jan;54(1):71-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.71.
6
The ethics and safety of alcohol administration in the experimental setting to individuals who have chronic, severe alcohol problems.
Alcohol Alcohol. 1993 Mar;28(2):189-97.
7
Why some children of alcoholics become alcoholics: emulation of the drinker.为何一些酗酒者的子女也会成为酗酒者:对饮酒者的模仿。
Adolescence. 1994 Spring;29(113):1-11.
8
Drinking and parental unpredictability among adult children of alcoholics: a pilot study.
Subst Use Misuse. 2001 Apr;36(5):609-38. doi: 10.1081/ja-100103563.
9
Developmental behavior-genetic perspective of alcoholism etiology.酒精中毒病因学的发育行为遗传学视角。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1991;9:69-85.
10
Parental history of alcoholism and problem behaviors in Native-American children and adolescents.美国原住民儿童和青少年的父母酗酒史及问题行为
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jan;24(1):30-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and motivators to participation and retention in HIV/HCV cohort studies among people who inject drugs: a community consultation in Iran.在伊朗的一次社区咨询中,探讨了影响注射吸毒人群参与和保留 HIV/HCV 队列研究的障碍和促进因素。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Aug 5;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00298-y.
2
"Money Helps": People who inject drugs and their perceptions of financial compensation and its ethical implications.“金钱起作用”:注射吸毒者及其对经济补偿及其伦理影响的看法
Ethics Behav. 2019;29(8):607-620. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2018.1535976. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
What Should We Do When Participants Report Dangerous Drinking? The Impact of Personalized Letters Versus General Pamphlets as a Function of Sex and Controlled Orientation.
当参与者报告危险饮酒行为时我们该怎么做?个性化信件与一般宣传册的影响作为性别和控制取向的函数
Ethics Behav. 2012;22(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2012.638817. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Laboratory alcohol self-administration experiments do not increase subsequent real-life drinking in young adult social drinkers.实验室酒精自我给药实验不会增加年轻成年社交饮酒者随后的现实生活中的饮酒量。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Jun;39(6):1057-63. doi: 10.1111/acer.12716. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Contingency management for cocaine treatment: cash vs. vouchers.可卡因治疗的应急管理:现金与代金券对比
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Aug;47(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
6
Effective Strategies for Maintaining Research Participation in Clinical Trials.维持临床试验中研究参与度的有效策略。
Drug Inf J. 2009 Jul;43(4). doi: 10.1177/009286150904300411.
7
Deception in human experimental and public health research on alcohol problems.关于酒精问题的人体实验和公共卫生研究中的欺骗行为。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839757.
8
Paying substance abusers in research studies: where does the money go?在研究中向药物滥用者付费:钱去了哪里?
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Jan;38(1):43-8. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.563337. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
9
The attitudes of females in drug court toward additional safeguards in HIV prevention research.药物法庭中女性对 HIV 预防研究中增加保障措施的态度。
Prev Sci. 2009 Dec;10(4):345-52. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0136-y.
10
Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion.更高额度的现金支付可提高研究随访率,且不会增加药物使用或感知到的胁迫。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Apr 18.