Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Jun;48(6):516-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
This article presents two studies that examine the hypothesis that obsessive-compulsive (OC) tendencies are associated with a general deficiency in subjective conviction, which leads to seeking and reliance on external proxies to compensate for that deficiency. We examined this hypothesis using a biofeedback-aided relaxation procedure. In Study 1 low OC participants performed better on a relaxation task than high OC participants. More importantly, viewing the biofeedback monitor (an external proxy for the internal state of relaxation) had a different effect on the two groups: Whereas high OC participants performed better, low OC participants did not. In addition, when given the opportunity, high OC participants requested the biofeedback monitor more than did the low OC participants. In Study 2 high OC participants were more affected by false biofeedback when judging their level of relaxation compared to low OC participants. Real relaxation level differences between the two false biofeedback phases among the two groups were not found. These results provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with deficient subjective conviction in internal states and increased reliance on external proxies. Implications for the understanding of OCD-related rules and rituals as well as for cognitive therapy for OCD are discussed.
本文提出了两项研究,旨在检验这样一种假设,即强迫观念(OC)倾向与主观信念的普遍缺失有关,而这种缺失会导致人们寻求并依赖外部代理来弥补。我们使用生物反馈辅助放松程序来检验这一假设。在研究 1 中,低 OC 参与者在放松任务上的表现优于高 OC 参与者。更重要的是,观看生物反馈监测器(放松状态的内部状态的外部代理)对这两个组有不同的影响:高 OC 参与者表现更好,而低 OC 参与者则没有。此外,当有机会时,高 OC 参与者比低 OC 参与者更需要生物反馈监测器。在研究 2 中,与低 OC 参与者相比,高 OC 参与者在判断自己的放松程度时更容易受到虚假生物反馈的影响。在两组参与者的两个虚假生物反馈阶段之间,没有发现真实的放松水平差异。这些结果初步支持了这样一种假设,即强迫症与内部状态的主观信念不足和对外部代理的过度依赖有关。讨论了对 OCD 相关规则和仪式的理解以及对 OCD 的认知治疗的影响。