• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病模型评分引入前后肝移植等待名单上的生存率

Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.

作者信息

Tenório A L, Macedo F I B, Miranda L E C, Fernandes J L, da Silva C M, Neto O L F, Lacerda C M

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Oswaldo Cruz University Hospital, University of Pernambuco School of Medicine, Recife, Brazil.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005
PMID:20304152
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since July 2006, the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has served as the national basis for allocation of donor livers for transplantation in Brazil. Patients with higher MELD scores receive greater priority for allocation regardless of the time on the waiting list.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of MELD score implementation on the survival of waiting list patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients registered at the national Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) for the liver transplantation waiting list between January 2004 and June 2006 (pre-MELD) and between July 2006 and December 2008 (post-MELD).

RESULTS

We included listed patients awaiting liver transplantation in the pre-MELD era (n = 250, 48.4%) and in the post-MELD era (n = 266, 51.6%). The times awaiting transplant prior to and after the MELD system were 487.2 +/- 384.8 days and 183.9 +/- 157.2 days, respectively. Prior to the MELD score, waiting list survivals were greater when compared to rates in the current system. Early posttransplant patient survival rates were significantly reduced in the post-MELD era (83.4%) compared to the period before MELD implementation (93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

MELD score provides a transparent, objective system to drive allocation policy; however, it presents several important limitations. Constant need of changes and reevaluation are needed as an evolutionary process. Future changes in the present system may be addressed by adjusting the MELD system.

摘要

背景

自2006年7月起,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分一直是巴西全国范围内分配供肝用于移植的依据。MELD评分较高的患者在分配中享有更高的优先级,而不考虑其在等待名单上的时间。

目的

研究实施MELD评分对等待名单上患者生存的影响。

方法

对2004年1月至2006年6月(MELD实施前)以及2006年7月至2008年12月(MELD实施后)期间在国家器官获取组织(OPO)登记进入肝移植等待名单的患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

我们纳入了MELD实施前时代等待肝移植的患者(n = 250,48.4%)和MELD实施后时代的患者(n = 266,51.6%)。MELD系统实施前后的等待移植时间分别为487.2±384.8天和183.9±157.2天。在MELD评分实施前,等待名单上的生存率高于当前系统中的生存率。与MELD实施前的时期(93.2%)相比,MELD实施后时代移植后早期患者生存率显著降低(83.4%)。

结论

MELD评分提供了一个透明、客观的系统来推动分配政策;然而,它存在一些重要局限性。作为一个演进过程,需要不断进行改变和重新评估。当前系统未来的变化可通过调整MELD系统来解决。

相似文献

1
Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分引入前后肝移植等待名单上的生存率
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005.
2
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.在一个单一中心进行的198例肝移植手术中,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与尸体供体的器官分配情况。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1903-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.016.
3
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score system to evaluate patients with viral hepatitis on the waiting list: better than the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system?用于评估等待肝移植患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统:比Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)系统更好吗?
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1906-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.072.
4
Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival?终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分是否不仅足以预测等待名单上的死亡,还能预测移植后的生存率?
Transpl Int. 2006 Apr;19(4):275-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00250.x.
5
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system to allocate and to share livers: experience of two Italian centers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统用于肝脏分配与共享:两个意大利中心的经验
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1814-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.053.
6
Survival before and after model for end-stage liver disease score introduction on the Brazilian liver transplant waiting list.巴西肝移植等待名单上引入终末期肝病模型评分前后的生存率。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.028.
7
Model for end-stage liver disease: impact of the new deceased donor liver allocation policy in São Paulo, Brazil.终末期肝病模型:巴西圣保罗新的脑死亡供体肝脏分配政策的影响
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):226-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.09.059.
8
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与供肝分配
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50016.
9
Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.肝移植等待名单中终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分分析
Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.023.
10
Characteristics of waitlisted patients for liver transplantation at a liver transplantation unit in the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, especially considering Child and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores.巴西圣保罗州里贝朗普雷图市一家肝移植单位中等待肝移植患者的特征,尤其考虑Child评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分。
Transplant Proc. 2007 Mar;39(2):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Sina Score as a New Machine Learning-Derived Online Prediction Model of Mortality for Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study.新浪评分作为一种新的基于机器学习的等待肝移植肝硬化患者死亡率在线预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4559. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134559.
2
Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?活体肝移植用于终末期肝病模型评分较高者:我们学到了什么?
World J Hepatol. 2016 Aug 8;8(22):942-8. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i22.942.
3
MELD-good for many, not as good for others … at least for now.
终末期肝病模型评分对许多人有益,但对其他人则不然……至少目前如此。
Hepatol Int. 2013 Jun;7(2):306-8. doi: 10.1007/s12072-012-9393-0. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
4
Impact of MELD allocation policy on survival outcomes after liver transplantation: a single-center study in northeast Brazil.MELD 分配政策对巴西东北部肝移植术后生存结果的影响:单中心研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(1):57-64. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000100011.