Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Clin Anesth. 2010 Mar;22(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.013.
To evaluate the accuracy of cardiac index (CI) as measured by echo-transesophageal Doppler monitoring (echo-TDM) with CI measured by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique.
Prospective, observational study.
University hospital.
16 patients scheduled for elective lung cancer resection.
Patients underwent two-lung ventilation (TLV) and one-lung ventilation (OLV).
CI measurements were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. Absolute values of CI as measured by both devices were highly correlated (r(2) ranging from 0.72 to 0.77), as were relative changes in CI after the start of OLV (r(2) = 0.48, P = 0.006). Before, during, and after OLV, TDM-CI biases were 0.46 +/- 0.28 L/min/m(2), 0.25 +/- 0.18 L/min/m(2), and 0.35 +/- 0.29 L/min/m(2), respectively. Limits of agreement remained stable throughout the three measurement periods (range -1.08 to 0.21 L/min/m(2)). The mean percentage error of CI measurements was 21.9% compared with the thermodilution technique. Although no adverse events were reported, 11% of measurement sets were incomplete due to poor signal detection.
Echo-TDM is a safe technique, allowing continuous semi-invasive assessment of hemodynamic changes in most patients undergoing open-chest surgery. Doppler-derived CI values showed significant biases and moderate clinical agreement with transpulmonary thermodilution during TLV and OLV.
评估经食管超声心动图(echo-TDM)测量心指数(CI)与经肺热稀释技术(transpulmonary thermodilution technique)测量 CI 的准确性。
前瞻性、观察性研究。
大学医院。
16 例择期行肺癌切除术的患者。
患者接受双肺通气(TLV)和单肺通气(OLV)。
采用 Bland-Altman 图分析 CI 测量值。两种设备测量的 CI 绝对值高度相关(r² 范围为 0.72 至 0.77),OLV 开始后 CI 的相对变化也高度相关(r² = 0.48,P = 0.006)。在 OLV 之前、期间和之后,TDM-CI 的偏差分别为 0.46 ± 0.28 L/min/m²、0.25 ± 0.18 L/min/m² 和 0.35 ± 0.29 L/min/m²。在整个三个测量期间,一致性界限保持稳定(范围 -1.08 至 0.21 L/min/m²)。与热稀释技术相比,CI 测量的平均误差百分比为 21.9%。尽管没有报告不良事件,但由于信号检测不良,11%的测量集不完整。
Echo-TDM 是一种安全的技术,允许大多数开胸手术患者连续进行半侵入性评估血流动力学变化。在 TLV 和 OLV 期间,多普勒衍生的 CI 值与经肺热稀释技术相比存在显著偏差和中等临床一致性。