Department of Surgery, School of Community Medicine, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, Tulsa, Okla 74135-2512, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.12.062. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
Hemodialysis access by autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) is generally recommended due to lower mortality, morbidity, and cost vs graft and catheter use. Many dialysis patients lack the common superficial veins used for standard AVF options and require transposition of a deep vein for autogenous dialysis access through a long open incision (open/AVF-T). These operations may require prolonged time for healing, thus extending catheter-based dialysis. We report our experience with minimally invasive techniques for creating AVF-Ts using an endoscopic procedure (endo/AVF-T).
We reviewed our vascular access database of consecutive access operations to identify consecutive patients with endo/AVF-Ts. For comparison, we also reviewed the immediate preceding traditional open/AVF-T operations that we previously reported. We evaluated demographics, time to access use, and primary, assisted, and cumulative patency.
We identified 100 consecutive endo/AVF-T operations attempted, and 98 were technically successful. The analysis excluded two conversions to successful open/AVF-T. The mean age of the 98 patients in the endo/AVF-T study group was 60 years (range, 22-94 years), 59 (60.2%) were women, 48 (49.0%) were diabetic, 20 (20.4%) were obese, and 52 (53.1%) had had previous access surgery. Mean time to initial use of the access for endo/AVF-Ts was 6 weeks for primary and 12 weeks for staged transpositions. Mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 1-30 months). The 12- and 24-month cumulative patencies were 95.5% and 88.6%. The 78 traditional open/AVF-T operations from our previous report were reviewed for comparison. The mean age was 62 years (range, 18-83 years), 57 (73.1%) were women, 44 (56.4%) were diabetic, 15 (19.2%) were obese, and 46 (59.0%) had previous access surgery. Mean time to initial use of the access for open/AVF-Ts was 8 weeks for primary and 16 weeks for staged operations. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 3-48 months). The 12- and 24-month cumulative patencies were 96.0 and 88.9%. No grafts were used in any patient during the study period.
Time to access use was less with endoscopic AVF-T (P < .01) for both primary and staged operations. Primary, assisted, and cumulative patency rates were the same for open and technically successful endoscopic transpositions. Endoscopic AVF-Ts offer a viable alternative to open AVF-Ts.
由于自体动静脉瘘(AVF)的死亡率、发病率和成本较低,因此通常建议使用自体动静脉瘘。许多透析患者缺乏用于标准 AVF 选择的常见浅静脉,需要通过长的开放切口(开放/AVF-T)转位深静脉以进行自体透析通路。这些手术可能需要更长的时间才能愈合,从而延长基于导管的透析。我们报告了使用内镜手术(endo/AVF-T)创建 AVF-T 的微创技术经验。
我们回顾了我们的血管通路数据库中连续的通路手术,以确定连续进行endo/AVF-T 的患者。为了进行比较,我们还回顾了我们之前报告的传统的开放/AVF-T 手术。我们评估了人口统计学、通路使用时间以及主要、辅助和累积通畅率。
我们确定了 100 例连续的endo/AVF-T 手术尝试,其中 98 例在技术上是成功的。该分析排除了 2 例转为成功的开放/AVF-T。endo/AVF-T 研究组的 98 例患者的平均年龄为 60 岁(范围,22-94 岁),59 例(60.2%)为女性,48 例(49.0%)为糖尿病患者,20 例(20.4%)为肥胖患者,52 例(53.1%)有过先前的通路手术史。endo/AVF-T 的初始使用时间为 6 周(主要)和 12 周(分期转位)。平均随访时间为 14 个月(范围,1-30 个月)。12 个月和 24 个月的累积通畅率分别为 95.5%和 88.6%。我们回顾了之前报告的 78 例传统的开放/AVF-T 手术进行比较。平均年龄为 62 岁(范围,18-83 岁),57 例(73.1%)为女性,44 例(56.4%)为糖尿病患者,15 例(19.2%)为肥胖患者,46 例(59.0%)有过先前的通路手术史。开放/AVF-T 的初始使用时间为 8 周(主要)和 16 周(分期手术)。平均随访时间为 18 个月(范围,3-48 个月)。12 个月和 24 个月的累积通畅率分别为 96.0%和 88.9%。在研究期间,没有患者使用移植物。
endo/AVF-T 的通路使用时间(主要和分期)比开放/AVF-T 短(P <.01)。开放和技术成功的内镜转位的主要、辅助和累积通畅率相同。内镜 AVF-T 是开放 AVF-T 的可行替代方案。