Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5):1145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.12.025. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
Vascular surgeons have increasingly become proficient in carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative treatment modality for cervical carotid artery occlusive disease. We analyzed our early and late outcomes of CAS over the last 8 years.
We report a single-center retrospective review of 388 carotid bifurcation lesions treated with CAS using cerebral embolic protection from May 2001 to July 2009. Data analysis includes demographics, procedural records, duplex exams, arteriograms, and two-view plain radiographs over a mean follow-up time of 23.0 months (interquartile range, 10.9-35.4).
At the time of treatment, the mean age of the entire cohort (76% men and 24% women) is 71 years; 13% were >/=80 years of age, and 31% had a prior history of either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and/or external beam neck irradiation (XRT). The mean carotid stenosis is 80%, and asymptomatic lesions represent 69% of the group. Overall 30-day rates of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction are 0.5%, 1.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. The combined death/stroke rate at 30 days is 2.3%. The 30-day major/minor stroke rates for analyzed subgroups are statistically significant only for XRT/recurrent stenosis vs de novo lesions, 0% and 2.6% (P = .03), but not for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients, 1.9% and 1.7% (P = .91) and age <80 vs >/=80, 2.0% and 1.8% (P = .52), respectively. At long-term, the freedom from all strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 99.2%, 97.6%, 96.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. At late follow-up, the restenosis rate is 3.5%. Restenosis rates for recurrent stenosis/XRT vs de novo lesions are 2.7% and 3.4% (P = .39). Among the restenotic lesions were two associated type III stent fractures in de novo lesions, both of which were closed-cell stents. An additional two other type I fractures have been identified, yielding a stent fracture rate of 5.5%. The late death rate for the entire group is 16.8%, with one stent-related death secondary to ipsilateral stroke at 20 months (0.3% death rate).
Vascular surgeons performing CAS with embolic protection can achieve good early and late outcomes that are comparable to CEA benchmarks. Late stent failures (stroke, restenosis, and/or stent fatigue), while uncommon, are a recognized delayed problem.
血管外科医生在颈动脉狭窄(CAS)治疗方面的技术日益精湛,该治疗方法已经成为治疗颈内动脉闭塞性疾病的替代方法。我们分析了过去 8 年来我们在 CAS 方面的早期和晚期结果。
我们报告了 2001 年 5 月至 2009 年 7 月间,采用颅内栓子保护装置治疗的 388 例颈动脉分叉病变患者的单中心回顾性研究。数据分析包括人口统计学、手术记录、双功能超声检查、血管造影以及平均随访 23.0 个月(四分位距,10.9-35.4)时的两视图平片。
在治疗时,整个队列的平均年龄(76%为男性,24%为女性)为 71 岁;13%的患者年龄≥80 岁,31%有颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和/或外照射颈部放疗(XRT)的既往史。颈动脉狭窄的平均程度为 80%,无症状病变占该组的 69%。总的 30 天死亡率、卒中和心肌梗死的发生率分别为 0.5%、1.8%和 0.8%。30 天内的死亡/卒中和发生率为 2.3%。分析亚组的 30 天主要/次要卒中发生率在 XRT/复发性狭窄与新发病变之间具有统计学意义,分别为 0%和 2.6%(P=0.03),但在无症状与有症状患者之间,1.9%和 1.7%(P=0.91)以及年龄<80 岁与≥80 岁之间,2.0%和 1.8%(P=0.52),差异均无统计学意义。长期随访时,12、24、36 和 48 个月时的无所有卒中发生率分别为 99.2%、97.6%、96.7%和 96.7%。在晚期随访中,再狭窄率为 3.5%。复发性狭窄/XRT 与新发病变的再狭窄率分别为 2.7%和 3.4%(P=0.39)。在再狭窄病变中,新发病变中有两处与支架相关的 III 型支架断裂,均为闭孔支架。另外还发现两处 I 型骨折,支架断裂率为 5.5%。整个研究组的晚期死亡率为 16.8%,其中 1 例支架相关卒中有 1 例同侧卒中有 20 个月(0.3%的死亡率)。
采用栓子保护装置进行 CAS 的血管外科医生可以获得与 CEA 基准相当的良好的早期和晚期结果。虽然不常见,但晚期支架失败(卒中和再狭窄和/或支架疲劳)是一个已被认识到的延迟性问题。