• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受骨髓清除性匹配同胞供体 BMT 治疗镰状细胞病的儿童中,靶向白消安治疗的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of targeted busulfan therapy in children undergoing myeloablative matched sibling donor BMT for sickle cell disease.

机构信息

Aflac Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;46(1):27-33. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.60. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2010.60
PMID:20305698
Abstract

Busulfan influences engraftment and toxicities during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We report our single-institution experience of targeted busulfan therapy for myeloablative, matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT for sickle cell disease (SCD) and assess the relationships of busulfan levels to engraftment and toxicities. Twenty-seven patients with SCD underwent MSD HSCT from 1993 to 2007, 25 with busulfan measurements. The conditioning regimen was busulfan (initial dose 0.875 mg/kg for 16 doses), CY and antithymocyte globulin. Busulfan area under curve (AUC) was determined with the first dose, and dose adjustments were made to target the desired AUC range. Median AUC was 963 μmol min/L (range 780-1305 μmol min/L). Engraftment occurred in all cases: 21 (84%) full donor chimerism (> 95% donor cells), 4 (16%) partial donor chimerism. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in 8 (32%) patients. Lower AUC was seen with partial donor chimerism (862 ± 73 μmol min/L) versus full donor chimerism (AUC 1018 ± 122 μmol min/L) (P = 0.022). VOD was not associated with busulfan AUC (P = 0.153). Of 25 patients, 24 survived with median follow-up of 4.9 years. Our experience shows that targeting busulfan AUC above the range used in previous multicenter trials appears safe and may contribute to sustained engraftment in SCD.

摘要

白消安会影响造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中的植入和毒性。我们报告了我们在单中心进行的针对骨髓清除性、匹配的同胞供体(MSD)HSCT 治疗镰状细胞病(SCD)的靶向白消安治疗经验,并评估了白消安水平与植入和毒性的关系。1993 年至 2007 年,27 例 SCD 患者接受了 MSD HSCT,其中 25 例进行了白消安测量。预处理方案为白消安(初始剂量 0.875mg/kg,共 16 剂)、环磷酰胺和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白。通过第一剂确定白消安的 AUC,并进行剂量调整以达到所需的 AUC 范围。中位数 AUC 为 963μmol min/L(范围 780-1305μmol min/L)。所有病例均发生植入:21 例(84%)完全供者嵌合体(>95%供体细胞),4 例(16%)部分供者嵌合体。8 例(32%)患者发生肝静脉闭塞性疾病(VOD)。部分供者嵌合体(862±73μmol min/L)的 AUC 低于完全供者嵌合体(AUC 1018±122μmol min/L)(P=0.022)。VOD 与白消安 AUC 无关(P=0.153)。25 例患者中,24 例存活,中位随访时间为 4.9 年。我们的经验表明,靶向白消安 AUC 高于先前多中心试验使用的范围似乎是安全的,并可能有助于 SCD 的持续植入。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of targeted busulfan therapy in children undergoing myeloablative matched sibling donor BMT for sickle cell disease.在接受骨髓清除性匹配同胞供体 BMT 治疗镰状细胞病的儿童中,靶向白消安治疗的安全性和有效性。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;46(1):27-33. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.60. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
2
Pharmacokinetics of a test dose of intravenous busulfan guide dose modifications to achieve an optimal area under the curve of a single daily dose of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.静脉注射白消安试验剂量的药代动力学指导剂量调整,以在接受造血干细胞移植的低强度预处理方案的儿童中实现每日单次静脉注射白消安的最佳曲线下面积。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;12(4):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.12.028.
3
Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.儿童异基因造血干细胞移植中静脉用白消安的安全性、疗效和药代动力学。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Feb;54(2):291-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22227.
4
Outcomes of matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe sickle cell disease with myeloablative conditioning and intermediate-dose of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin.采用清髓性预处理和中等剂量兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白的同胞全相合供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型镰状细胞病的疗效
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Sep;61(9):1685-9. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25059. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Once-daily intravenous busulfan with therapeutic drug monitoring compared to conventional oral busulfan improves survival and engraftment in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.与传统口服白消安相比,每日一次静脉注射白消安并进行治疗药物监测可提高接受异基因干细胞移植儿童的生存率和植入率。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jan;14(1):88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.09.015.
6
New insights into the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children with sickle cell anemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation.镰状细胞贫血患儿接受骨髓移植时静脉注射白消安的药代动力学新见解。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Apr;62(4):680-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25376. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
7
Age-dependent pharmacokinetic profile of single daily dose i.v. busulfan in children undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning stem cell transplant.接受低强度预处理干细胞移植的儿童每日静脉注射一次白消安的年龄依赖性药代动力学特征。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Aug;44(3):145-56. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.437. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
8
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Congenital Hemoglobinopathies Using a Tailored Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen: Single-Center Experience.使用定制的基于白消安的预处理方案进行先天性血红蛋白病的异基因干细胞移植:单中心经验
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jun;22(6):1043-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
9
Improved clinical outcome of paediatric bone marrow recipients using a test dose and Bayesian pharmacokinetic individualization of busulfan dosage regimens.采用白消安剂量方案的试验剂量和贝叶斯药代动力学个体化,改善儿科骨髓移植受者的临床结局。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Oct;28(8):743-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703207.
10
Association of busulfan area under the curve with veno-occlusive disease following BMT.白消安曲线下面积与骨髓移植后静脉闭塞性疾病的关联。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Feb;17(2):225-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Late effects of hemopoietic stem cell transplant for sickle cell disease: monitoring and management.镰状细胞病造血干细胞移植的晚期效应:监测与管理
Expert Rev Hematol. 2024 Dec;17(12):891-905. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2423368. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treating pediatric sickle cell disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.造血干细胞移植治疗小儿镰状细胞病的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 May;32(5):102049. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102049. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Pre-existing anti-factor VIII immunity alters therapeutic platelet-targeted factor VIII engraftment following busulfan conditioning through cytotoxic CD8 T cells.
先前存在的抗因子 VIII 免疫通过细胞毒性 CD8 T 细胞改变了马法兰预处理后的治疗性血小板靶向因子 VIII 植入。
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Mar;21(3):488-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Across the Myeloablative Spectrum: Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Conditioning Regimens for Pediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.跨越清髓谱系:镰状细胞病儿科患者的造血细胞移植预处理方案
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 3;11(13):3856. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133856.
5
American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for sickle cell disease: stem cell transplantation.美国血液学会 2021 年镰状细胞病指南:干细胞移植。
Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 28;5(18):3668-3689. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004394C.
6
Modified diagnostic criteria, grading classification and newly elucidated pathophysiology of hepatic SOS/VOD after haematopoietic cell transplantation.造血细胞移植后肝脏 SOS/VOD 的改良诊断标准、分级分类和新阐明的病理生理学。
Br J Haematol. 2020 Sep;190(6):822-836. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16557. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Stem cell transplantation in sickle cell disease: therapeutic potential and challenges faced.镰状细胞病中的干细胞移植:治疗潜力与面临的挑战
Expert Rev Hematol. 2018 Jul;11(7):547-565. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2018.1486703. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
The case for HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with symptomatic sickle cell anemia.HLA 全相合同胞造血干细胞移植用于有症状的镰状细胞贫血患儿的病例分析
Blood Adv. 2017 Dec 8;1(26):2563-2567. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007708. eCollection 2017 Dec 12.
9
Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen in Sibling and Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children with Sickle Cell Disease.基于曲奥舒凡的预处理方案用于镰状细胞病患儿的同胞及替代供者造血干细胞移植
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;9(1):e2017014. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.014. eCollection 2017.
10
Novel insights in the management of sickle cell disease in childhood.儿童镰状细胞病管理的新见解。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2016 Feb 8;5(1):25-34. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i1.25.