Suppr超能文献

密集血管护理预防痴呆的整群随机试验中的方法学问题。

Methodological issues in a cluster-randomized trial to prevent dementia by intensive vascular care.

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Apr;14(4):315-7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0072-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Description of methodological issues in a trial designed to evaluate if a multi-component intervention aimed at vascular risk factors can prevent dementia.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multi-center, open, cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial (preDIVA) including 3535 non-demented subjects aged 70-78, executed in primary practice and coordinated from one academic hospital. General practices are randomized to standard care or intensive vascular care.

INTERVENTION

Vascular care consists of 4-monthly visits to a practice nurse who monitors all cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, overweight, lack of physical exercise and diabetes are strictly controlled according to a protocol and treated in a way, tailored to the characteristics of individual participants.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes are incident dementia and disability; secondary outcomes are mortality, vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease), cognitive decline and depression.

RESULTS

Between May 2006 and February 2009, 3535 subjects from 115 general practices have been included. The clusters have an average size of 31 (SD 22, range 2-114). 1658 Patients from 52 practices were randomized to the standard care condition and 1877 patients in 63 practices to the vascular care condition.

DISCUSSION

When designing a cluster-randomized trial, clustering of patient data within GP practices leads to a loss of power. This should be adjusted for in the power calculation. Since intensive vascular care will probably lead to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality, the competing risks of mortality and dementia should be taken into account.

摘要

目的

描述一项旨在评估多因素干预是否可预防痴呆的临床试验中的方法学问题。

设计、地点和参与者:多中心、开放、整群随机对照临床试验(preDIVA),纳入 3535 名年龄 70-78 岁、无痴呆的受试者,在基层医疗机构开展,由一家学术医院进行协调。基层医疗单位被随机分为标准护理组或强化血管护理组。

干预措施

血管护理包括每 4 个月由一名护士对所有心血管危险因素进行监测。根据方案严格控制高血压、高胆固醇血症、超重、缺乏身体活动和糖尿病,根据个体参与者的特点进行个体化治疗。

测量指标

主要结局为新发痴呆和残疾;次要结局为死亡率、血管事件(中风、心肌梗死、外周血管疾病)、认知能力下降和抑郁。

结果

2006 年 5 月至 2009 年 2 月,115 家基层医疗机构共纳入 3535 名受试者。每个群组的平均规模为 31 名(SD 22,范围 2-114)。52 家基层医疗机构的 1658 名患者被随机分配至标准护理组,63 家基层医疗机构的 1877 名患者被随机分配至强化血管护理组。

讨论

在设计整群随机试验时,患者数据在基层医疗机构中的聚类会导致效能降低。在效能计算中应进行相应调整。由于强化血管护理可能会降低心血管死亡率,因此应考虑死亡和痴呆的竞争风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验