• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

6 年多领域血管护理干预预防痴呆的效果(preDIVA):一项群组随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):797-805. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30950-3. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30950-3
PMID:27474376
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk of dementia. We assessed whether a multidomain intervention targeting these factors can prevent dementia in a population of community-dwelling older people.

METHODS

In this open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial, we recruited individuals aged 70-78 years through participating general practices in the Netherlands. General practices within each health-care centre were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation sequence, to either a 6-year nurse-led, multidomain cardiovascular intervention or control (usual care). The primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of dementia and disability score (Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score [ALDS]) at 6 years of follow-up. The main secondary outcomes were incident cardiovascular disease and mortality. Outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. Analyses included all participants with available outcome data. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN29711771.

FINDINGS

Between June 7, 2006, and March 12, 2009, 116 general practices (3526 participants) within 26 health-care centres were recruited and randomly assigned: 63 (1890 participants) were assigned to the intervention group and 53 (1636 participants) to the control group. Primary outcome data were obtained for 3454 (98%) participants; median follow-up was 6·7 years (21 341 person-years). Dementia developed in 121 (7%) of 1853 participants in the intervention group and in 112 (7%) of 1601 participants in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·71-1·19; p=0·54). Mean ALDS scores measured during follow-up did not differ between groups (85·7 [SD 6·8] in the intervention group and 85·7 [7·1] in the control group; adjusted mean difference -0·02, 95% CI -0·38 to 0·42; p=0·93). 309 (16%) of 1885 participants died in the intervention group, compared with 269 (16%) of 1634 participants in the control group (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·80-1·18; p=0·81). Incident cardiovascular disease did not differ between groups (273 [19%] of 1469 participants in the intervention group and 228 [17%] of 1307 participants in the control group; HR 1·06, 95% CI 0·86-1·31; p=0·57).

INTERPRETATION

A nurse-led, multidomain intervention did not result in a reduced incidence of all-cause dementia in an unselected population of older people. This absence of effect might have been caused by modest baseline cardiovascular risks and high standards of usual care. Future studies should assess the efficacy of such interventions in selected populations.

FUNDING

Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; Dutch Innovation Fund of Collaborative Health Insurances; and Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

摘要

背景

心血管危险因素与痴呆风险增加相关。我们评估了针对这些因素的多领域干预是否可以预防社区居住的老年人发生痴呆。

方法

在这项开放标签、整群随机对照试验中,我们通过荷兰的参与实践招募了 70-78 岁的个体。每个医疗中心内的实践通过计算机生成的随机序列,以 1:1 的比例随机分配到 6 年的护士主导的多领域心血管干预或对照组(常规护理)。主要结局是在 6 年随访时累积痴呆和残疾评分(学术医学中心线性残疾评分[ALDS])的发生率。主要次要结局是心血管疾病的发生率和死亡率。结果评估者对组分配进行了盲法。分析包括所有具有可用结局数据的参与者。这项试验在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 ISRCTN29711771。

结果

2006 年 6 月 7 日至 2009 年 3 月 12 日,26 个医疗中心内的 116 个实践(3526 名参与者)被招募并随机分配:63 个(1890 名参与者)被分配到干预组,53 个(1636 名参与者)被分配到对照组。主要结局数据来自 3454 名(98%)参与者;中位随访时间为 6.7 年(21 341 人年)。在干预组的 1853 名参与者中,121 名(7%)发生痴呆,在对照组的 1601 名参与者中,112 名(7%)发生痴呆(风险比[HR]0.92,95%CI0.71-1.19;p=0.54)。在随访期间测量的平均 ALDS 评分在两组之间没有差异(干预组为 85.7[SD6.8],对照组为 85.7[7.1];调整后的平均差异-0.02,95%CI-0.38 至 0.42;p=0.93)。在干预组中,309 名(16%)参与者死亡,而在对照组中,269 名(16%)参与者死亡(HR0.98,95%CI0.80-1.18;p=0.81)。心血管疾病的发生率在两组之间没有差异(干预组的 1469 名参与者中有 273 名[19%],对照组的 1307 名参与者中有 228 名[17%];HR1.06,95%CI0.86-1.31;p=0.57)。

解释

在未选择的老年人群中,护士主导的多领域干预并不能降低全因痴呆的发生率。这种无效应可能是由于基线心血管风险较低和常规护理标准较高所致。未来的研究应评估此类干预措施在选定人群中的疗效。

资金

荷兰卫生部、福利和体育部;荷兰创新基金合作健康保险;荷兰健康研究和发展组织。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.6 年多领域血管护理干预预防痴呆的效果(preDIVA):一项群组随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):797-805. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30950-3. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
2
Effect of Long-Term Vascular Care on Progression of Cerebrovascular Lesions: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Substudy of the PreDIVA Trial (Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care).长期血管护理对脑血管病变进展的影响:PreDIVA 试验(强化血管护理预防痴呆)的磁共振成像子研究。
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1842-1848. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017207. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Determinants of Dropout and Nonadherence in a Dementia Prevention Randomized Controlled Trial: The Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care Trial.一项痴呆症预防随机对照试验中退出和不依从的决定因素:强化血管护理预防痴呆症试验
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1505-1513. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14834. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial.一项针对高危老年人的饮食、运动、认知训练和血管风险监测的 2 年多领域干预措施,以预防认知能力下降(FINGER):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
[Is dementia preventable through intensive vascular care? The preDIVA trial].[通过强化血管护理能否预防痴呆症?DIVA前期试验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D1184.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an intervention for reducing cholesterol and cardiovascular risk for people with severe mental illness in English primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.英国初级保健中针对严重精神疾病患者降低胆固醇和心血管疾病风险干预措施的临床效果及成本效益:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;5(2):145-154. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30007-5. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Modifiable dementia risk score to study heterogeneity in treatment effect of a dementia prevention trial: a post hoc analysis in the preDIVA trial using the LIBRA index.可修改的痴呆风险评分用于研究痴呆预防试验治疗效果的异质性:使用 LIBRA 指数对 preDIVA 试验进行事后分析。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jun 30;10(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0389-4.
8
Effect of health risk assessment and counselling on health behaviour and survival in older people: a pragmatic randomised trial.健康风险评估与咨询对老年人健康行为及生存的影响:一项实用随机试验
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):e1001889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a nurse-delivered intervention to improve adherence to treatment for HIV: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial.护士主导的干预措施提高 HIV 治疗依从性的效果和成本效益:一项实用、多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;17(6):595-604. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30534-5. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Integrated multidisciplinary care in Parkinson's disease: a non-randomised, controlled trial (IMPACT).帕金森病的综合多学科护理:一项非随机对照试验(IMPACT)。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Oct;12(10):947-56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70196-0. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation.作为脑保护搏动性调节器的颈动脉虹吸部:动脉钙化形成的作用。
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 4;15(8):356. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080356.
2
Lifestyle, genetic risk, plasma pTau217, and incident cognitive impairment in WRAP.生活方式、遗传风险、血浆pTau217与WRAP研究中的认知功能障碍发生率
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70573. doi: 10.1002/alz.70573.
3
Interventions to improve cognitive performance in chronic kidney disease: A scoping review.
改善慢性肾脏病认知功能的干预措施:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329815. eCollection 2025.
4
An inflammatory fingerprint in mild cognitively impaired patients is reversed by physical and cognitive training.身体和认知训练可逆转轻度认知障碍患者的炎症特征。
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025 Jul 18;48:101062. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101062. eCollection 2025 Oct.
5
Dual Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase and Monoamine Oxidase-B for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的乙酰胆碱酯酶和单胺氧化酶-B双重抑制剂
Molecules. 2025 Jul 15;30(14):2975. doi: 10.3390/molecules30142975.
6
Structured vs Self-Guided Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions for Global Cognitive Function: The US POINTER Randomized Clinical Trial.结构化与自我引导的多领域生活方式干预对整体认知功能的影响:美国POINTER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12923.
7
CITA GO-ON study. A community based multidomain lifestyle intervention to prevent cognitive decline. Protocol design and recruitment process.CITA GO-ON研究。一项基于社区的多领域生活方式干预预防认知衰退的研究。方案设计与招募过程。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 16;17:1539711. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1539711. eCollection 2025.
8
Associations of semaglutide with Alzheimer's disease-related dementias in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world target trial emulation study.司美格鲁肽与2型糖尿病患者阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症的关联:一项真实世界的目标试验模拟研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jun 24:13872877251351329. doi: 10.1177/13872877251351329.
9
Mechanisms of interventions targeting modifiable factors for dementia risk reduction.针对可改变因素降低痴呆风险的干预机制。
Mol Neurodegener. 2025 Jun 23;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13024-025-00845-w.
10
Multidomain interventions for prevention of dementia: Achievements, challenges and future perspectives.预防痴呆的多领域干预措施:成就、挑战与未来展望。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Aug;25(8):1015-1034. doi: 10.1111/ggi.70088. Epub 2025 Jun 17.