NIEHS/NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Account Res. 2010 Mar;17(2):79-84. doi: 10.1080/08989621003641181.
In this study we gathered data on the misconduct policies of social science journals and combined it with the data from our previous study on journal misconduct policies, which did not include enough social science journals for data analysis. Consistent with our earlier finding, impact factor of the journal was the only variable significantly associated with whether a journal had a formal (written) misconduct policy with an odds-ratio of 1.72 (p < 0.01). We did not find that type of science (physical, biomedical, or social) or publisher had a significant effect on whether a journal had a policy. Another important finding is that less than half of the journals that responded to the survey had a formal misconduct policy.
在这项研究中,我们收集了社会科学期刊不当行为政策的数据,并将其与我们之前关于期刊不当行为政策的研究数据相结合,后者没有包含足够的社会科学期刊进行数据分析。与我们之前的发现一致,期刊的影响因子是唯一与期刊是否有正式(书面)不当行为政策显著相关的变量,优势比为 1.72(p<0.01)。我们没有发现科学类型(物理、生物医学或社会)或出版商对期刊是否有政策有显著影响。另一个重要发现是,只有不到一半的对调查做出回应的期刊有正式的不当行为政策。