Suppr超能文献

社科期刊科研不端行为政策与影响因子

Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor.

机构信息

NIEHS/NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2010 Mar;17(2):79-84. doi: 10.1080/08989621003641181.

Abstract

In this study we gathered data on the misconduct policies of social science journals and combined it with the data from our previous study on journal misconduct policies, which did not include enough social science journals for data analysis. Consistent with our earlier finding, impact factor of the journal was the only variable significantly associated with whether a journal had a formal (written) misconduct policy with an odds-ratio of 1.72 (p < 0.01). We did not find that type of science (physical, biomedical, or social) or publisher had a significant effect on whether a journal had a policy. Another important finding is that less than half of the journals that responded to the survey had a formal misconduct policy.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们收集了社会科学期刊不当行为政策的数据,并将其与我们之前关于期刊不当行为政策的研究数据相结合,后者没有包含足够的社会科学期刊进行数据分析。与我们之前的发现一致,期刊的影响因子是唯一与期刊是否有正式(书面)不当行为政策显著相关的变量,优势比为 1.72(p<0.01)。我们没有发现科学类型(物理、生物医学或社会)或出版商对期刊是否有政策有显著影响。另一个重要发现是,只有不到一半的对调查做出回应的期刊有正式的不当行为政策。

相似文献

1
Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor.
Account Res. 2010 Mar;17(2):79-84. doi: 10.1080/08989621003641181.
2
Research misconduct policies of scientific journals.
Account Res. 2009;16(5):254-67. doi: 10.1080/08989620903190299.
3
Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051928. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
4
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):136-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.006.
5
Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
J Med Ethics. 2014 Sep;40(9):644-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101822. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals.
J R Soc Med. 2014 Oct;107(10):384-5. doi: 10.1177/0141076814548526.
7
Authorship policies of scientific journals.
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals.
Account Res. 2006 Jul-Sep;13(3):247-58. doi: 10.1080/08989620600848199.
9
Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category.
Gac Sanit. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):430-434. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
10
Retracted science and the retraction index.
Infect Immun. 2011 Oct;79(10):3855-9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05661-11. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Jul 7;28(4):31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00386-1.
2
Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies.
Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):139-156. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
3
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.
Curr Sociol. 2017 Oct;65(6):814-845. doi: 10.1177/0011392116663807. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
4
Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jan;59(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000910.
5
Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):521-554. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Authorship policies of scientific journals.
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: the romanian connection.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):183-202. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.
PLoS Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
9
Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries.
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051928. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Research misconduct policies of scientific journals.
Account Res. 2009;16(5):254-67. doi: 10.1080/08989620903190299.
2
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
4
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.
Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):471-9. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验