Suppr超能文献

无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的早期手术与常规治疗比较。

Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology, Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 388-1, Poongnap-dong, Songpa-ku, Seoul, Korea 138-736.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1502-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.909903. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial in asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis. We therefore compared the long-term results of early surgery and a conventional treatment strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1996 to 2006, we prospectively included a total of 197 consecutive asymptomatic patients (99 men; age, 63+/-12 years) with very severe aortic stenosis. Patients were excluded if they had angina, syncope, exertional dyspnea, ejection fraction <0.50, significant mitral valve disease, or age >85 years. Very severe aortic stenosis was defined as a critical stenosis in the aortic valve area < or =0.75 cm(2) accompanied by a peak aortic jet velocity > or =4.5 m/s or a mean transaortic pressure gradient > or =50 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography. The primary end point was defined as the composite of operative mortality and cardiac death during follow-up. Early surgery was performed on 102 patients, and a conventional treatment strategy was used for 95 patients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score, or ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 1501 days, the operated group had no operative mortalities, no cardiac deaths, and 3 noncardiac deaths; the conventional treatment group had 18 cardiac and 10 noncardiac deaths. The estimated actuarial 6-year cardiac and all-cause mortality rates were 0% and 2+/-1% in the operated group and 24+/-5% and 32+/-6% in the conventional treatment group, respectively (P<0.001), and for 57 propensity score-matched pairs, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the operated group than in the conventional treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.135; 95% confidence interval, 0.030 to 0.597; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the conventional treatment strategy, early surgery in patients with very severe aortic stenosis is associated with an improved long-term survival by decreasing cardiac mortality. Early surgery is therefore a therapeutic option to further improve clinical outcomes in asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis and low operative risk.

摘要

背景

在无症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,手术干预的最佳时机仍存在争议。因此,我们比较了早期手术和常规治疗策略的长期结果。

方法和结果

1996 年至 2006 年,我们前瞻性地纳入了 197 例连续的无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者(99 例男性;年龄 63+/-12 岁)。排除标准为心绞痛、晕厥、劳力性呼吸困难、射血分数<0.50、明显的二尖瓣疾病或年龄>85 岁。重度主动脉瓣狭窄定义为主动脉瓣面积<或=0.75 cm²,伴有峰值主动脉射流速度>或=4.5 m/s 或平均跨主动脉压力梯度>或=50 mmHg 的严重狭窄,经多普勒超声心动图证实。主要终点定义为随访期间手术死亡率和心脏性死亡的复合终点。102 例患者行早期手术,95 例患者行常规治疗策略。两组在年龄、性别、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统评分或射血分数方面无显著差异。中位随访 1501 天,手术组无手术死亡,无心脏死亡,3 例非心脏死亡;常规治疗组有 18 例心脏死亡和 10 例非心脏死亡。手术组的估计 6 年心脏和全因死亡率分别为 0%和 2+/-1%,常规治疗组分别为 24+/-5%和 32+/-6%(P<0.001),对于 57 对倾向评分匹配的患者,手术组的全因死亡率显著低于常规治疗组(风险比,0.135;95%置信区间,0.030 至 0.597;P=0.008)。

结论

与常规治疗策略相比,重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的早期手术可降低心脏死亡率,从而提高长期生存率。因此,早期手术是一种治疗选择,可以进一步改善低手术风险无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验