• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初发无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的自然病史:一项单阶段荟萃分析

Natural history of initially asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a one-stage meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tan Joshua Teik Ann, He George Shiyao, Chia Jolene Li Ling, Tan Gladys Qiao Xuan, Teo Yao Neng, Teo Yao Hao, Syn Nicholas L, Chai Ping, Wong Raymond C C, Yeo Tiong-Cheng, Kong William K F, Poh Kian-Keong, Sia Ching-Hui

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar;114(3):350-367. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02465-8. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-024-02465-8
PMID:39009912
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines on the management strategy for patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remain unclear. This uncertainty stems from the lack of data regarding the natural history of these patients. To address this gap, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the natural history of asymptomatic severe AS patients receiving conservative treatment.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from inception to 24 January 2024 using the keywords "asymptomatic" AND "aortic" AND "stenosis". We included studies examining patients with asymptomatic severe AS. In interventional trials, only data from conservatively managed arms were collected. A one-stage meta-analysis was conducted using individual patient data reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Sensitivity analysis was performed for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients who remained asymptomatic throughout follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies were included (n = 9545). The median time to the development of symptoms was 1.11 years (95% CI 0.90-1.53). 49.36% (40.85-58.59) of patients who were asymptomatic had suffered a major adverse cardiovascular event by 5 years. The median event-free time for heart failure hospitalization (HFH) was 5.50 years (95% CI 5.14-5.91) with 36.34% (95% CI 33.34-39.41) of patients experiencing an HFH by year 5. By 5 years, 79.81% (95% CI 69.26-88.58) of patients developed symptoms (angina, dyspnoea, syncope and others) and 12.36% (95% CI 10.01-15.22) of patients died of cardiovascular causes. For all-cause mortality, the median survival time was 9.15 years (95% CI 8.50-9.96) with 39.43% (CI 33.41-36.40) of patients dying by 5 years. The median time to AVR was 4.77 years (95% CI 4.39-5.17), with 52.64% (95% CI 49.85-55.48) of patients requiring an AVR by 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal poor cardiovascular outcomes for patients with asymptomatic severe AS on conservative treatment. A significant proportion eventually requires an AVR. Further research is needed to determine if early intervention with AVR is more effective than conservative treatment.

摘要

背景

目前关于无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者管理策略的指南仍不明确。这种不确定性源于缺乏这些患者自然病史的数据。为填补这一空白,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究接受保守治疗的无症状重度AS患者的自然病史。

方法

使用关键词“无症状”“主动脉”“狭窄”,在PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库中从建库至2024年1月24日进行检索。我们纳入了研究无症状重度AS患者的研究。在干预性试验中,仅收集保守治疗组的数据。使用从已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线重建的个体患者数据进行单阶段荟萃分析。对在整个随访期间仍无症状的患者的主要不良心血管结局进行敏感性分析。

结果

共纳入46项研究(n = 9545)。出现症状的中位时间为1.11年(95%CI 0.90 - 1.53)。49.36%(40.85 - 58.59)的无症状患者在5年内发生了主要不良心血管事件。因心力衰竭住院(HFH)的无事件中位时间为5.50年(95%CI 5.14 - 5.91),到第5年有36.34%(95%CI 33.34 - 39.41)的患者发生HFH。到5年时,79.81%(95%CI 69.26 - 88.58)的患者出现症状(心绞痛、呼吸困难、晕厥等),12.36%(95%CI 10.01 - 15.22)的患者死于心血管原因。对于全因死亡率,中位生存时间为9.15年(95%CI 8.50 - 9.96),到5年时有39.43%(CI 33.41 - 36.40)的患者死亡。进行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的中位时间为4.77年(95%CI 4.39 - 5.17),到5年时52.64%(95%CI 49.85 - 55.48)的患者需要进行AVR。

结论

我们的结果显示,接受保守治疗的无症状重度AS患者的心血管结局较差。很大一部分患者最终需要进行AVR。需要进一步研究以确定早期AVR干预是否比保守治疗更有效。

相似文献

1
Natural history of initially asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a one-stage meta-analysis.初发无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的自然病史:一项单阶段荟萃分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar;114(3):350-367. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02465-8. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Early aortic valve replacement versus conservative management in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Meta-analysis of time-to-event data of randomized controlled trials.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者早期主动脉瓣置换术与保守治疗的比较:随机对照试验事件发生时间数据的Meta分析
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Aug 1;432:133269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133269. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Early intervention or watchful waiting for asymptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的早期干预或密切观察等待:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Nov;21(11):897-904. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001110.
4
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与保守治疗在无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄中的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Sep;42:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
An Observational Study of Elderly Veterans With Initially Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.一项对初始无症状的老年退伍军人重度主动脉瓣狭窄的观察性研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):166-170. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00319. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Initial Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Conservative Strategy on Long-Term Outcomes in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.年龄相关的初始主动脉瓣置换与保守策略对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者长期结局的影响差异。
Circ J. 2020 Jan 24;84(2):252-261. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0431. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
7
Natural History of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Association of Early Intervention With Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的自然史及早期干预与结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;5(10):1102-1112. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2497.
8
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者保守治疗的主动脉瓣口面积对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010198. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010198.
9
Aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial.主动脉瓣置换与无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的保守治疗:AVATAR 试验的长期随访。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 8;45(42):4526-4535. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae585.
10
Meta-Analysis of Early Intervention Versus Conservative Management for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的早期干预与保守治疗的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;138:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Benchmark for Modern Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The Whole-Life Cycle Management System.心脏瓣膜病现代管理的新基准:全生命周期管理系统
JACC Asia. 2025 May;5(5):609-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.01.017. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Comparing Early Intervention to Watchful Waiting: A Review on Risk Stratification and Management in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.比较早期干预与观察等待:无症状主动脉瓣狭窄的风险分层与管理综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 4;61(3):448. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030448.
3
Shaping the Optimal Timing for Treatment of Isolated Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: The Role of Non-Invasive Diagnostics Focused on Strain Echocardiography and Future Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Early surgery vs conservative management among asymptomatic aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的早期手术与保守治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Sep 22;43:101125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101125. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial.主动脉瓣置换与保守治疗无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄:AVATAR 试验。
Circulation. 2022 Mar;145(9):648-658. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057639. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
3
Association of metabolic-bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants.
确定左心室射血分数保留的孤立性无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的最佳治疗时机:聚焦应变超声心动图的非侵入性诊断作用及未来展望
J Imaging. 2025 Feb 8;11(2):48. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11020048.
代谢性减重手术与有或无糖尿病成人长期生存的关联:一项对 174772 名参与者的匹配队列和前瞻性对照研究的一阶段荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1830-1841. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00591-2. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Intervention.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者及干预措施的影响
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Mar 31;8(4):35. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8040035.
5
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Natural History of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Association of Early Intervention With Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的自然史及早期干预与结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;5(10):1102-1112. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2497.
7
Long-Term Survival of Asymptomatic Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis: Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment.无症状的极重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期生存:早期手术与传统治疗对比
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 12;75(18):2379-2380. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.036.
8
Determinants and clinical significance of aortic stiffness in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis.中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉僵硬度的决定因素及临床意义
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 15;315:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.081. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Left ventricular myocardial fibrosis: a marker of bad prognosis in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.左心室心肌纤维化:有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后不良的一个标志物。
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 21;41(20):1915-1917. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa151.
10
Asymptomatic aortic stenosis in a geriatric population. The role of frailty and comorbidity in mortality.老年人群中的无症状主动脉瓣狭窄。脆弱和合并症在死亡率中的作用。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Feb;74(2):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 24.