Kisilevsky B S, Killen H, Muir D W, Low J A
School of Nursing, Departments of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):889-92.
Two methods of evaluating fetal movement responses elicited by vibroacoustic stimulation--maternal perceptions and ultrasound scan observations--were compared in 58 low-risk and 35 high-risk pregnancies from 23-36 weeks' gestation. Maternal perception of vibrator-elicited fetal movement was poor compared with ultrasound scan observation. Regardless of gestational age or risk status, the mothers perceived 27-75% fewer movements than observed with ultrasound scan. In addition, maternal movement perceptions on vibrator versus no-stimulus control trials were not reliable until 29-32 weeks' gestation, with the percentage of movement responses increasing across gestation from 11 to 48%. In contrast, ultrasound scan observations of movement were reliable on vibrator compared with no-stimulus control trials from 26 weeks, with the percentage of movement responses increasing from 22% at 23-25 weeks to 94% at 35-36 weeks. We conclude that maternal perceptions of fetal movements cannot be substituted for ultrasound scan observations for accurate assessment of fetal movements during vibroacoustic stimulation testing.
在58例低风险和35例高风险妊娠(孕23 - 36周)中,比较了两种评估由振动声学刺激引发的胎动反应的方法——母体感知和超声扫描观察。与超声扫描观察相比,母体对振动器引发的胎动感知较差。无论孕周或风险状态如何,母亲感知到的胎动比超声扫描观察到的少27% - 75%。此外,在孕29 - 32周之前,振动器试验与无刺激对照试验相比,母体对胎动的感知不可靠,胎动反应的百分比在整个孕期从11%增加到48%。相比之下,从孕26周起,与无刺激对照试验相比,超声扫描对振动器引发胎动的观察是可靠的,胎动反应的百分比从23 - 25周时的22%增加到35 - 36周时的94%。我们得出结论,在振动声学刺激测试期间,母体对胎动的感知不能替代超声扫描观察来准确评估胎动。