Engelken E J, Stevens K W, Enderle J D
U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Clinical Sciences Division, Brooks AFB, TX.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Apr;62(4):315-8.
Manual reaction time (RT) responses were analyzed from seven human subjects. Responses were recorded using four kinds of target presentations: fixed visual target, moving visual target, fixed auditory target, and moving auditory target. Moving targets (moving in the horizontal plane) were presented at constant intensity and provided only a motion cue. Fixed targets "popped on" at the primary position and provided only an onset cue. RTs for the fixed and moving visual targets were 241.5 ms and 233.1 ms, respectively. The 8.4 ms (3.5%) advantage for the moving visual target over the fixed visual target was statistically significant, p less than 0.05. RT for the moving auditory target varied with target movement amplitude and ranged from 219 ms for 40 degree movements to 268 ms for 5 degree movements. For the fixed auditory target in the sagittal plane, average RT was 182.9 ms. Thus, sound-source motion detection was from 36 to 85 ms slower than sound onset detection, p less than 0.001. The RT results were compared to saccade latency measurements from an earlier study. Both RT and saccade latency showed the same dependency upon target movement amplitude. For small target displacements, saccade latencies for the moving auditory target were longer than for the moving visual target. The longer latencies for the moving auditory target are attributed to the increased processing time required to detect the sound-source motion.
分析了7名人类受试者的手动反应时间(RT)响应。使用四种目标呈现方式记录响应:固定视觉目标、移动视觉目标、固定听觉目标和移动听觉目标。移动目标(在水平面上移动)以恒定强度呈现,仅提供运动线索。固定目标在初始位置“突然出现”,仅提供起始线索。固定视觉目标和移动视觉目标的RT分别为241.5毫秒和233.1毫秒。移动视觉目标比固定视觉目标有8.4毫秒(3.5%)的优势,具有统计学意义,p小于0.05。移动听觉目标的RT随目标运动幅度而变化,范围从40度运动时的219毫秒到5度运动时的268毫秒。对于矢状面中的固定听觉目标,平均RT为182.9毫秒。因此,声源运动检测比声音起始检测慢36至85毫秒,p小于0.001。将RT结果与早期研究中的扫视潜伏期测量结果进行了比较。RT和扫视潜伏期都显示出对目标运动幅度相同的依赖性。对于小目标位移,移动听觉目标的扫视潜伏期比移动视觉目标的长。移动听觉目标较长的潜伏期归因于检测声源运动所需的处理时间增加。