Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂治疗前后口服地尔硫䓬的电生理效应

Electrophysiologic effects of oral diltiazem before and after beta blockade.

作者信息

Kumar K, Bajaj R, Kaul U, Bahl V K

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1991 Apr;14(4):317-20. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960140407.

Abstract

We conducted electrophysiologic (EP) studies and estimated the sinus node function and atrioventricular (AV) conduction in 10 patients with suspected coronary arterial disease (age range 35-55 years) before and during diltiazem therapy (60 mg thrice daily for 5-7 days). The effect of beta blockade (0.1 mg/kg of intravenous propranolol) was evaluated in both EP studies. The mean spontaneous sinus cycle length (SCL) and the AV nodal Wenckebach cycle lengths (AVWB) were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) after propranolol alone (913 +/- 131 and 504 +/- 197 ms, respectively) compared with baseline values (SCL: 827 +/- 149 ms, AVWB: 439 +/- 173 ms). Diltiazem alone failed to influence the SCL and AVWB significantly. Following the combination (diltiazem + propranolol), SCL (945 +/- 147 ms) and AVWB (533 +/- 148 ms) were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than baseline and post diltiazem values (SCL: 840 +/- 150 ms; AVWB 457 +/- 103 ms). None of the other parameters (sinoatrial conduction time, corrected sinus node recovery time, AH and HV intervals, AV nodal and atrial effective refractory periods) were significantly influenced by propranolol, diltiazem, or the combination. No patient developed AV block, sinus arrest/sinoatrial exit block, or symptomatic sinus bradycardia following beta blockade after diltiazem administration. Oral diltiazem therapy alone and after beta blockade does not appear to adversely influence the sinus node function and AV conduction in patients below the age of 55 years. The combination of diltiazem and beta blocker thus appears safe in selected patients with coronary arterial disease.

摘要

我们对10例疑似冠状动脉疾病患者(年龄范围35 - 55岁)在接受地尔硫䓬治疗前及治疗期间(每日三次,每次60mg,共5 - 7天)进行了电生理(EP)研究,并评估了窦房结功能和房室(AV)传导。在两项EP研究中均评估了β受体阻滞剂(静脉注射普萘洛尔0.1mg/kg)的效果。单独使用普萘洛尔后,平均自发窦房结周期长度(SCL)和房室结文氏周期长度(AVWB)与基线值相比显著升高(p小于0.05)(分别为913±131和504±197毫秒),基线值分别为(SCL:827±149毫秒,AVWB:439±173毫秒)。单独使用地尔硫䓬未能显著影响SCL和AVWB。联合使用(地尔硫䓬 + 普萘洛尔)后,SCL(945±147毫秒)和AVWB(533±148毫秒)显著高于基线值和地尔硫䓬治疗后的值(SCL:840±150毫秒;AVWB 457±103毫秒)。其他参数(窦房传导时间、校正窦房结恢复时间、AH和HV间期、房室结和心房有效不应期)均未受到普萘洛尔、地尔硫䓬或联合用药的显著影响。在给予地尔硫䓬后进行β受体阻滞剂治疗后,没有患者出现房室传导阻滞、窦性停搏/窦房传导阻滞或症状性窦性心动过缓。单独口服地尔硫䓬治疗以及β受体阻滞剂治疗后,似乎不会对55岁以下患者的窦房结功能和房室传导产生不利影响。因此,地尔硫䓬与β受体阻滞剂联合使用在选定的冠状动脉疾病患者中似乎是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验