Valenzuela J E, Berlin R G, Snape W J, Johnson T L, Hirschowitz B I, Colon-Pagan J, Morse R S, Petrozza J, Van Deventer G M, Cagliola A
USC School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033.
Dig Dis Sci. 1991 Jun;36(6):761-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01311234.
To assess the comparative efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg, a proton pump inhibitor, versus ranitidine 150 mg twice a day, an H2-receptor antagonist, in healing duodenal ulcers we performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in 309 patients with endoscopically diagnosed ulcers. Patients were treated for up to four weeks and were seen at week 2 and at week 4, if unhealed at week 2, for determination of ulcer status by endoscopy, review of daily self-assessment symptom diaries, and clinical laboratory including fasting serum gastrin. Gastrin levels were repeated two weeks after cessation of study medication. Evaluation of baseline demographic and laboratory parameters demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups at entry. At week 2, 42% of the omeprazole and 34% of the ranitidine-treated patients were healed (P = NS). At week 4, there was a 19% advantage in ulcer healing for the omeprazole-treated patients in comparison to those treated with ranitidine (82% vs 63%, respectively, P less than 0.05). Healing of ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm occurred in 83% of those treated with omeprazole versus 37% treated with ranitidine (P less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of pain relief or incidence of clinical laboratory abnormalities. Mean fasting serum gastrin value during treatment increased over the baseline in both groups, (P less than 0.05). The percent change was significantly greater with omeprazole but few patients had elevations above the upper limit of normal for the assay. Both drugs were well tolerated. Omeprazole 20 mg demonstrated superiority in healing duodenal ulcers at four weeks in comparison to ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and was more effective in healing ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm.
为评估质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑20毫克与H2受体拮抗剂雷尼替丁每日两次150毫克在十二指肠溃疡愈合方面的相对疗效,我们对309例经内镜诊断为溃疡的患者进行了一项随机、双盲、多中心试验。患者接受治疗长达四周,并在第2周和第4周就诊,若第2周未愈合,则在第4周通过内镜检查确定溃疡状态,审查每日自我评估症状日记,并进行包括空腹血清胃泌素在内的临床实验室检查。在停止研究用药两周后重复检测胃泌素水平。对基线人口统计学和实验室参数的评估显示,两组入组时无显著差异。在第2周,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者中有42%愈合,接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者中有34%愈合(P=无显著性差异)。在第4周,与接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者相比,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者在溃疡愈合方面有19%的优势(分别为82%和63%,P<0.05)。≥1.0厘米的溃疡愈合率在接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者中为83%,而接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者中为37%(P<0.01)。在疼痛缓解率或临床实验室异常发生率方面无显著差异。治疗期间两组的平均空腹血清胃泌素值均高于基线水平(P<0.05)。奥美拉唑组的变化百分比显著更大,但很少有患者的胃泌素水平升高超过检测正常上限。两种药物耐受性均良好。与每日两次150毫克雷尼替丁相比,20毫克奥美拉唑在四周内治疗十二指肠溃疡方面表现出优越性,并且在愈合≥1.0厘米的溃疡方面更有效。