• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

T2 期胆囊癌行初次根治性切除与二次补救性根治性切除的临床疗效对比分析:单中心经验

Comparative analysis between clinical outcomes of primary radical resection and second completion radical resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: single-center experience.

机构信息

Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1572-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0522-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-010-0522-4
PMID:20333380
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder (GB) cancer may be discovered incidentally by histopathologic examination following simple cholecystectomy. Incidental GB cancer > or =T2 or > or =N1 needs a second radical resection. It is a matter of concern whether the prognosis may be worse in patients with T2GB cancer who undergo a second radical resection than in those who undergo primary radical resection.

METHODS

Between March 2001 and March 2009, 21 patients underwent a one-step operation (OSO group), and 17 patients underwent a two-step operation (TSO group) for T2GB cancer. We compared clinicopathologic factors and survival between patients in the OSO group (n = 9) and those in the TSO group (n = 9) with T2N0M0 GB cancer and between patients in the OSO group (n = 12) and those in the TSO group (n = 8) with T2N1M0 GB cancer.

RESULTS

Except for patient age, clinicopathologic factors as well as disease-free survival were not significantly different between the OSO group and the TSO group in the aforementioned cancer stages. Patient age was significantly higher in the OSO group than in the TSO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Second completion radical resection following initial simple cholecystectomy (TSO) provided a survival benefit similar to that of primary radical surgery (OSO) for patients with both T2N0M0 and T2N1M0 GB cancers in our study.

摘要

背景

胆囊(GB)癌可能在简单的胆囊切除术后通过组织病理学检查偶然发现。偶然发现的 > or =T2 或 > or =N1 的 GB 癌需要进行第二次根治性切除术。对于接受第二次根治性切除术的 T2GB 癌患者,其预后是否比接受原发性根治性切除术的患者更差,这是一个值得关注的问题。

方法

2001 年 3 月至 2009 年 3 月,21 例患者接受一步手术(OSO 组),17 例患者接受两步手术(TSO 组)治疗 T2GB 癌。我们比较了 OSO 组(n = 9)和 TSO 组(n = 9)中 T2N0M0GB 癌患者、OSO 组(n = 12)和 TSO 组(n = 8)中 T2N1M0GB 癌患者的临床病理因素和生存情况。

结果

除患者年龄外,上述癌症分期的 OSO 组和 TSO 组之间的临床病理因素和无病生存率均无显著差异。OSO 组患者的年龄明显高于 TSO 组。

结论

在我们的研究中,对于 T2N0M0 和 T2N1M0GB 癌患者,初始简单胆囊切除术后进行第二次完成性根治性切除术(TSO)提供的生存获益与原发性根治性手术(OSO)相似。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis between clinical outcomes of primary radical resection and second completion radical resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: single-center experience.T2 期胆囊癌行初次根治性切除与二次补救性根治性切除的临床疗效对比分析:单中心经验
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1572-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0522-4.
2
Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.胆囊癌:明确原发性根治性切除术和根治性再次切除术的适应证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):833-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
3
[Immediate radical re-resection of incidental T1b  gallbladder cancer and the problem of an adequate extent of resection (results of the German Registry "Incidental Gallbladder Cancer")].[意外发现的T1b期胆囊癌的即刻根治性再次切除术及切除范围是否足够的问题(德国“意外胆囊癌”登记研究结果)]
Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Dec;139 Suppl 2:e43-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262698. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Clinical outcomes of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder.胆囊小细胞神经内分泌癌和腺癌的临床结局
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):269-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.269.
5
Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer.淋巴结评估与早期胆囊癌手术后生存率的提高相关。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):706-11; discussion 711-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056.
6
Surgical treatment of patients with T2 gallbladder carcinoma invading the subserosal layer.侵犯浆膜下层的T2期胆囊癌患者的外科治疗
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 May;192(5):600-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00814-6.
7
Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection.胆囊癌:腹腔镜检查与根治性切除术的作用
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):893-901. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31806beec2.
8
Surgical procedure determination based on tumor-node-metastasis staging of gallbladder cancer.基于胆囊癌肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期的手术方案确定
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4620-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4620.
9
Do hepatic-sided tumors require more extensive resection than peritoneal-sided tumors in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer? Results of a retrospective multicenter study.对于T2期胆囊癌患者,肝侧肿瘤是否比腹膜侧肿瘤需要更广泛的切除?一项回顾性多中心研究的结果
Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):515-524. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
Long-term outcomes of surgical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: an institutional evaluation.T1b 期胆囊癌行手术切除的长期疗效:一项机构评估。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6507-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic treatment for suspected gallbladder cancer confined to the wall: a 10-year study from a single institution.腹腔镜治疗局限于胆囊壁的疑似胆囊癌:来自单一机构的10年研究。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;30(1):84-92. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.09.
2
Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter study.肿瘤位置是T2期胆囊癌肿瘤进展和生存的有力预测指标:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):733-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000728.
3
Management of incidental and suspicious gallbladder cancer: focus on early referral to a tertiary centre.

本文引用的文献

1
The risk of gallbladder cancer from polyps in a large multiethnic series.一个大型多民族队列研究中息肉引发胆囊癌的风险
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;35(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.036. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
2
Benefits of reoperation of T2 and more advanced incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German registry.T2期及更晚期意外胆囊癌再次手术的益处:德国登记处分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):104-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318154bf5d.
3
Surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: a review.胆囊癌的外科治疗:综述
意外发现及可疑胆囊癌的管理:重点在于早期转诊至三级医疗中心。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jul;16(7):641-7. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12189. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
Incidental gallbladder cancer by the AFC-GBC-2009 Study Group.AFC-GBC-2009 研究组偶然发现的胆囊癌。
World J Surg. 2011 Aug;35(8):1887-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1134-3.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep;11(9):1188-93. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0115-1.
4
Extended hepatic resection for gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌扩大肝切除术
Am J Surg. 2007 Sep;194(3):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.013.
5
Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection.胆囊癌:腹腔镜检查与根治性切除术的作用
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):893-901. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31806beec2.
6
A curative resection improves the postoperative survival rate even in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma.即使对于晚期胆囊癌患者,根治性切除术也能提高术后生存率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Aug;11(8):1025-32. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0181-4.
7
Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.胆囊癌:明确原发性根治性切除术和根治性再次切除术的适应证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):833-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
8
Management of cancer gallbladder found as a surprise on a resected gallbladder specimen.在切除的胆囊标本中意外发现的胆囊癌的管理。
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun 15;93(8):690-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20537.
9
Surgical strategies in patients with gallbladder cancer: nihilism to optimism.胆囊癌患者的手术策略:从虚无主义到乐观主义。
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun 15;93(8):670-81. doi: 10.1002/jso.20535.
10
The surgical management of incidental gallbladder carcinoma.意外胆囊癌的外科治疗
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Feb;31(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.09.006.