• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

臀筋膜推进术:一种治疗藏毛窦疾病的创新、有效方法。

Gluteal fascial advancement: an innovative, effective method for treating pilonidal disease.

作者信息

Washer Joshua D, Smith Dane E, Carman Mary E, Blackhurst Dawn W

机构信息

Academic Department of Surgery, Greenville Hospital System, University Medical Center, 701 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2010 Feb;76(2):154-6.

PMID:20336891
Abstract

The ideal elective surgical procedure for pilonidal disease is debated. Simple excision and closure is commonly performed but is associated with a high incidence of wound complications and recurrence. We developed a simple modification of primary closure, which involves the elevation, mobilization, and closure of the gluteal fascia. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of this gluteal fascial advancement technique with standard primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. We retrospectively reviewed our surgical database to include all patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal disease from 2004 to 2007. Patients who underwent primary closure (n = 66) were compared with patients who underwent gluteal fascial advancement (n = 17). Demographic data as well as recurrence and the incidence of wound complications were examined. There was a significant difference in incidence of wound breakdown (0 vs 21%), recurrence (0 vs 20%), and early wound drainage (6 vs 32%). Overall there was an 80 per cent reduction in wound complications after gluteal fascial advancement compared with primary closure. Gluteal fascial advancement is a simple modification of standard primary closure and is associated with fewer wound complications and recurrences.

摘要

藏毛疾病理想的择期手术方式存在争议。单纯切除缝合是常用的术式,但伤口并发症和复发的发生率较高。我们对一期缝合进行了一项简单改良,包括臀筋膜的游离、上移和缝合。本研究旨在比较这种臀筋膜推进技术与标准一期缝合治疗藏毛疾病的疗效。我们回顾性分析了手术数据库,纳入2004年至2007年间所有因藏毛疾病接受手术的患者。将接受一期缝合的患者(n = 66)与接受臀筋膜推进术的患者(n = 17)进行比较。分析了人口统计学数据以及复发情况和伤口并发症的发生率。伤口裂开发生率(0% 对21%)、复发率(0% 对20%)和早期伤口引流情况(6% 对32%)存在显著差异。总体而言,与一期缝合相比,臀筋膜推进术后伤口并发症减少了80%。臀筋膜推进术是对标准一期缝合的简单改良,可减少伤口并发症和复发。

相似文献

1
Gluteal fascial advancement: an innovative, effective method for treating pilonidal disease.臀筋膜推进术:一种治疗藏毛窦疾病的创新、有效方法。
Am Surg. 2010 Feb;76(2):154-6.
2
Gluteal Fascial Advancement for Pilonidal Cyst Disease: A 10-year Review.臀筋膜推进术治疗藏毛窦疾病:一项10年回顾性研究
Am Surg. 2016 Jul;82(7):622-5.
3
[Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate].藏毛窦切除术后一期中线缝合与高复发率相关。
Chirurg. 2003 May;74(5):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0616-8.
4
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:切除后一期缝合或皮瓣重建。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
5
Experience with pilonidal disease in children.儿童肛门部藏毛窦疾病的诊治经验。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术中Limberg皮瓣与V-Y皮瓣相比复发率更低。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1436-44. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0276-8.
7
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease.前瞻性随机对照试验比较皮瓣推进术与原发性缝合方法在藏毛窦疾病中的应用。
Am J Surg. 2010 Feb;199(2):170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.030. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
8
Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision and primary closure: results of 493 patients.采用斜行切除和一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病:493例患者的治疗结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jan;49(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0226-2.
9
Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients.藏毛窦疾病不同手术方式的比较:175例患者的回顾性分析
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007 Feb;23(2):67-70. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70377-8.
10
Crossed triangular flaps technique for surgical treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.交叉三角皮瓣技术治疗慢性藏毛窦疾病
Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):503-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.503.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.地理因素和手术方式对全球藏毛窦疾病复发的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
2
A new surgical approach for pilonidal sinus disease: "de-epithelialization technique''.藏毛窦疾病的一种新手术方法:“去上皮化技术”
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jan 4;34(1):43-48. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3632. eCollection 2018.
3
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.
常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
4
Outcomes in the repair of pilonidal sinus disease excision wounds using a parasacral perforator flap.使用骶旁穿支皮瓣修复藏毛窦疾病切除伤口的效果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Jan;94(1):12-6. doi: 10.1308/003588412x13171221499748.
5
S-plasty for pilonidal disease: modified primary closure reducing tension.藏毛疾病的S形皮瓣修复术:改良一期缝合以减轻张力
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Feb;82(2):63-9. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.63. Epub 2012 Jan 27.