Post-graduate Program in Wildlife Biology and Conservation, Wildlife Conservation Society-India Program, National Centre for Biological Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India.
Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1130-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01467.x. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
Freshwater biodiversity conservation is generally perceived to conflict with human use and extraction (e.g., fisheries). Overexploited fisheries upset the balance between local economic needs and endangered species' conservation. We investigated resource competition between fisheries and Ganges river dolphins (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in a human-dominated river system in India to assess the potential for their coexistence. We surveyed a 65-km stretch of the lower Ganga River to assess habitat use by dolphins (encounter rates) and fishing activity (habitat preferences of fishers, intensity of net and boat use). Dolphin abundance in the main channel increased from 179 (SE 7) (mid dry season) to 270 (SE 8) (peak dry season), probably as a result of immigration from upstream tributaries. Dolphins preferred river channels with muddy, rocky substrates, and deep midchannel waters. These areas overlapped considerably with fishing areas. Sites with 2-6 boats/km (moderately fished) were more preferred by dolphins than sites with 8-55 boats/km (heavily fished). Estimated spatial (85%) and prey-resource overlap (75%) between fisheries and dolphins (chiefly predators of small fish) suggests a high level of competition between the two groups. A decrease in abundance of larger fish, indicated by the fact that small fish comprised 74% of the total caught, may have intensified the present competition. Dolphins seem resilient to changes in fish community structure and may persist in overfished rivers. Regulated fishing in dolphin hotspots and maintenance of adequate dry season flows can sustain dolphins in tributaries and reduce competition in the main river. Fish-stock restoration and management, effective monitoring, curbing destructive fishing practices, secure tenure rights, and provision of alternative livelihoods for fishers may help reconcile conservation and local needs in overexploited river systems.
淡水生物多样性保护通常被认为与人类的利用和开采(例如渔业)相冲突。过度开发的渔业破坏了当地经济需求与濒危物种保护之间的平衡。我们在印度一个以人类为主导的河流系统中研究了渔业和恒河海豚(Platanista gangetica gangetica)之间的资源竞争,以评估它们共存的潜力。我们对恒河下游的 65 公里河段进行了调查,以评估海豚的栖息地利用情况(相遇率)和捕鱼活动(渔民的栖息地偏好、网和船的使用强度)。海豚在主河道的数量从(旱季中期)179 只(SE7)增加到(旱季高峰)270 只(SE8),可能是因为来自上游支流的移民。海豚更喜欢有泥泞、多石底质和深中部水域的河道。这些地区与捕鱼区有很大的重叠。每公里有 2-6 艘船(中度捕鱼)的区域比每公里有 8-55 艘船(重度捕鱼)的区域更受海豚欢迎。渔业和海豚(主要以小鱼为食)之间的空间(85%)和猎物资源重叠(75%)估计表明,这两个群体之间存在高度的竞争。较大鱼类数量的减少表明,小鱼占总捕获量的 74%,这可能加剧了目前的竞争。海豚似乎对鱼类群落结构的变化具有弹性,并且可能在过度捕捞的河流中生存。在海豚热点地区进行有管理的捕捞,并保持充足的旱季流量,可以维持支流中的海豚,并减少主河道中的竞争。鱼类种群恢复和管理、有效监测、遏制破坏性捕捞做法、保障渔民的土地保有权以及为渔民提供替代生计,可能有助于协调过度捕捞河流系统中的保护和当地需求。