Suppr超能文献

利用氯化物和肌酐试纸估算单次尿样中 24 小时的钠排泄量。

Estimation of 24-h sodium excretion from a spot urine sample using chloride and creatinine dipsticks.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2010 Jul;23(7):743-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.57. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite its clinical relevance, sodium intake is seldom monitored by physicians, largely because of shortcomings of the 24-h urine collection for sodium excretion. In a prior study, sodium excretion was shown to be accurately estimated from a late afternoon/early evening spot urine sodium/creatinine ratio, adjusted for 24-h creatinine excretion. In this study, we assessed a more convenient and inexpensive method, using chloride and creatinine dipsticks.

METHODS

Subjects submitted 24-h urine collections along with an "AM sample," collected at the beginning, a "PM sample" collected in the late afternoon/early evening before dinner, at roughly the midpoint, and a "random sample," collected after completion, of the 24-h collection. Predicted 24-h sodium excretion was then determined from the spot urine dipstick chloride/creatinine ratio, measured by two independent observers, and from the spot urine laboratory sodium/creatinine ratio. Both ratios were adjusted for 24-h creatinine excretion.

RESULTS

For PM samples, predicted sodium excretion correlated strongly with actual 24-h sodium excretion, both for the dipstick method (r = 0.71; observer 1 and r = 0.65; observer 2; both P < 0.001), and the laboratory method (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). PM samples also differentiated subjects with sodium excretion <100 mEq/day vs. > or =100 mEq/day (sensitivity and specificity: dipstick method: 83 and 82%, respectively for observer 1, 89 and 77%, respectively, for observer 2; laboratory method: 100 and 82%, respectively). AM samples and random samples correlated less strongly.

CONCLUSION

The dipstick method appears promising as a convenient and inexpensive means to serially assess sodium excretion.

摘要

背景

尽管钠摄入量具有临床相关性,但医生很少对其进行监测,主要是因为 24 小时尿液收集法在测量钠排泄量方面存在缺陷。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现通过测量傍晚/深夜时的一次随机尿钠/肌酐比值,同时对 24 小时肌酐排泄量进行校正,可以准确估计钠排泄量。在本研究中,我们评估了一种更方便、更经济的方法,即使用氯和肌酐试纸。

方法

受试者同时提供 24 小时尿液样本和“AM 样本”(清晨收集)、“PM 样本”(傍晚/深夜收集,大约在晚餐前收集,即 24 小时收集的中点)和“随机样本”(24 小时收集完成后收集)。然后,根据两名独立观察者测量的随机尿试纸氯/肌酐比值和实验室钠/肌酐比值,通过两种方法预测 24 小时钠排泄量。这两种比值都经过 24 小时肌酐排泄量校正。

结果

对于 PM 样本,通过试纸法(观察者 1:r = 0.71;观察者 2:r = 0.65;均 P < 0.001)和实验室法(r = 0.86,P < 0.001),预测的钠排泄量与实际 24 小时钠排泄量均呈强相关性。PM 样本也能区分钠排泄量 <100 mEq/天和≥100 mEq/天的受试者(试纸法:观察者 1 的敏感性和特异性分别为 83%和 82%,观察者 2 的敏感性和特异性分别为 89%和 77%;实验室法:敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 82%)。AM 样本和随机样本相关性较弱。

结论

试纸法作为一种方便、经济的连续评估钠排泄量的方法具有一定前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验