Cuttner J, Mick R, Budman D R, Mayer R J, Lee E J, Henderson E S, Weiss R B, Paciucci P A, Sobol R, Davey F
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Division of Hematology, New York, NY 10029-6574.
Leukemia. 1991 May;5(5):425-31.
This paper reports a study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) comparing daunorubicin (DNR) or mitoxantrone (DHAD) in induction followed by multidrug intensification over 8 months in adult patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). A total of 164 newly diagnosed patients were randomly assigned to either DNR or DHAD plus vincristine, prednisone and methotrexate given intravenously (i.v.) and interthecally (i.t.). Patients received four more intensification courses of chemotherapy and then all therapy was stopped. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis consisted of nine infusions of intermediate dose methotrexate (MTX) and intrathecal MTX. DHAD and DNR were equally effective in producing complete remissions (63 and 65%, respectively). The estimated median remission duration is 10.2 and 12.3 months for the DHAD and DNR arms, respectively (p = 0.56). This study was stopped earlier than planned when it became apparent that remission duration for both arms was shorter than seen in our prior study in which all patients received more than 1 year of maintenance therapy. The estimated median survival is 18.3 and 20.6 months for the DHAD and DNR arms, respectively (p = 0.90). Younger patients and patients with a pre-treatment white blood count of less than 30,000/microliters had a significantly longer remission duration and survival. Eleven per cent of patients who achieved a complete remission have had a CNS relapse to date, which is not different from the rate in our prior study using cranial irradiation and i.t. MTX, implying that intermediate dose MTX with i.t. MTX may be as effective as cranial irradiation and i.t. MTX. This study suggests that some form of maintenance chemotherapy is required for the eradication of residual leukemia cells.
本文报告了癌症与白血病B组(CALGB)的一项研究,该研究比较了柔红霉素(DNR)或米托蒽醌(DHAD)在成年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者诱导治疗中的效果,随后进行为期8个月的多药强化治疗。总共164例新诊断患者被随机分配接受DNR或DHAD联合静脉注射(i.v.)和鞘内注射(i.t.)的长春新碱、泼尼松和甲氨蝶呤治疗。患者接受了另外四个疗程的强化化疗,然后停止所有治疗。中枢神经系统(CNS)预防措施包括九次中等剂量甲氨蝶呤(MTX)输注和鞘内注射MTX。DHAD和DNR在诱导完全缓解方面同样有效(分别为63%和65%)。DHAD组和DNR组的估计中位缓解持续时间分别为10.2个月和12.3个月(p = 0.56)。当明显发现两组的缓解持续时间均短于我们之前所有患者均接受超过1年维持治疗的研究时,该研究提前终止。DHAD组和DNR组的估计中位生存期分别为18.3个月和20.6个月(p = 0.90)。年龄较小以及治疗前白细胞计数低于30,000/微升的患者缓解持续时间和生存期明显更长。截至目前,11%达到完全缓解的患者发生了CNS复发,这与我们之前使用颅脑照射和鞘内注射MTX的研究中的复发率没有差异,这意味着中等剂量MTX联合鞘内注射MTX可能与颅脑照射和鞘内注射MTX同样有效。这项研究表明,需要某种形式的维持化疗来根除残留的白血病细胞。