Fontenelle Júlia M, Santana Lívia da S, Lessa Larissa da R, Victoria Mara S da, Mendlowicz Mauro V, Fontenelle Leonardo F
Programa de Ansiedade e Depressão, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;32(1):77-82. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462010000100015.
To update clinicians regarding the existence of a putative subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder based on poor insight.
Opinionative review based on studies indexed in the PubMed and PsychINFO databases, identified by means of the keywords 'obsessive-compulsive disorder' AND 'insight' OR 'ego-syntonic', and published between 1966 and October 2009. The results were analyzed according to the approach adopted, i.e. a categorical or dimensional view of insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
The review of recent studies led us to identify some issues that cast doubts over the existence of a clear-cut poor insight subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder. These issues include 1) an extremely variable prevalence of poor insight obsessive-compulsive disorder in categorical studies, 2) a significant degree of homogeneity in the phenotypical findings (i.e. greater severity) associated with lower levels of insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder in both categorical and dimensional studies and, 3) a lack of studies investigating zones of rarity between poor and good insight obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Although a categorical approach to the insight issue in obsessive-compulsive disorder is still important in clinical settings, where decision-making is often a critical issue, a dimensional approach seems to reflect levels of impairment in these patients more reliably.
就基于自知力差的一种假定的强迫症亚型的存在情况向临床医生提供最新信息。
基于对PubMed和PsychINFO数据库中索引的研究进行的观点性综述,通过关键词“强迫症”和“自知力”或“自我和谐性”进行检索,并筛选出1966年至2009年10月期间发表的研究。根据所采用的方法对结果进行分析,即对强迫症自知力的分类或维度观点。
对近期研究的综述使我们发现了一些对明确的自知力差的强迫症亚型的存在提出质疑的问题。这些问题包括:1)在分类研究中,自知力差的强迫症患病率变化极大;2)在分类和维度研究中,与强迫症自知力水平较低相关的表型发现(即更严重程度)存在显著程度的同质性;3)缺乏对自知力差和自知力好的强迫症之间罕见区域的研究。
尽管在临床环境中,对强迫症自知力问题采用分类方法仍然很重要,因为在临床中决策往往是关键问题,但维度方法似乎更可靠地反映了这些患者的损害程度。