• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对11岁和12岁儿童的噪声间隙测试。

The Gap in Noise test in 11 and 12-year-old children.

作者信息

Perez Ana Paula, Pereira Liliane Desgualdo

机构信息

Fonoaudióloga do Programa de Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Pro Fono. 2010 Jan-Mar;22(1):7-12. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000100003.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-56872010000100003
PMID:20339801
Abstract

BACKGROUND

gap detection in 11 and 12-year-old children.

AIM

to investigate temporal resolution through the Gap in Noise test in children of 11 and 12 years in order to establish criteria of normal development.

METHOD

participants were 92 children, with ages of 11 and 12 years, enrolled in elementary school, with no evidences of otologic, and/or neurologic, and/or cognitive disorders, as well as with no history of learning difficulties or school failure. Besides that, participants' hearing thresholds were within normal limits and their verbal recognition in the dichotic test of digits was equal or superior to 95% of hits. All were submitted to the Gap in Noise test. The statistical analysis was performed by non-parametric tests with significance level of 0.05 (5%).

RESULTS

the average of the gap thresholds was 5.05 ms, and the average percentage of correct answers was 71.70%. There was no significant statistical difference between the responses by age (eleven and twelve years), by ear (right and left), by gender (male and female). However, when comparing the tests, it was observed that the 1st test showed a higher percentage of identifications of gap, statistically significant than the 2nd test.

CONCLUSION

in 78.27% of the population of this study, the gap thresholds were up to 5 ms, response recommended as normality reference for the age group searched.

摘要

背景

11岁和12岁儿童的间隙检测。

目的

通过对11岁和12岁儿童进行噪声间隙测试来研究时间分辨率,以建立正常发育标准。

方法

研究对象为92名11岁和12岁的小学生,他们没有耳科、神经科和/或认知障碍的证据,也没有学习困难或学业失败的病史。此外,参与者的听力阈值在正常范围内,并且他们在数字双耳测试中的言语识别率等于或高于95%的正确率。所有参与者均接受噪声间隙测试。采用非参数检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为0.05(5%)。

结果

间隙阈值的平均值为5.05毫秒,正确答案的平均百分比为71.70%。年龄(11岁和12岁)、耳朵(右耳和左耳)、性别(男性和女性)之间的反应没有显著统计学差异。然而,在比较测试时,观察到第一次测试的间隙识别百分比更高,在统计学上显著高于第二次测试。

结论

在本研究人群中,78.27%的人的间隙阈值高达5毫秒,该反应建议作为所研究年龄组的正常参考。

相似文献

1
The Gap in Noise test in 11 and 12-year-old children.针对11岁和12岁儿童的噪声间隙测试。
Pro Fono. 2010 Jan-Mar;22(1):7-12. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000100003.
2
Gaps-in-Noise test: gap detection thresholds in 9-year-old normal-hearing children.噪声间隙测试:9岁正常听力儿童的间隙检测阈值
J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011 Dec;23(4):364-7.
3
The gaps-in-noise test: gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults.噪声间隙测试:正常听力的年轻成年人的间隙检测阈值
Int J Audiol. 2008 May;47(5):238-45. doi: 10.1080/14992020801908244.
4
Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.听觉神经病患儿的随机间隙检测试验和随机间隙检测试验-扩展结果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov;73(11):1558-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
5
Adaptive tests of temporal resolution: comparison with the gaps-in-noise test in normal-hearing young adults.时间分辨率的适应性测试:与正常听力的年轻成年人的噪声间隙测试比较。
Int J Audiol. 2015 Jan;54(1):29-36. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.952457.
6
Temporal resolution: performance of school-aged children in the GIN - Gaps-in-noise test.时间分辨率:学龄儿童在 GIN-噪声间隙测试中的表现。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov-Dec;76(6):745-52. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000600013.
7
Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) performance of individuals with central auditory processing disorders from 5 to 25 years of age.5至25岁患有中枢听觉处理障碍个体的随机间隙检测测试(RGDT)表现。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;76(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
8
Study of the right ear advantage on gap detection tests.关于间隙检测测试中右耳优势的研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Mar-Apr;74(2):235-40. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31094-6.
9
[Temporal resolution: analysis in term and preterm preschoolers].[时间分辨率:足月儿和早产儿学龄前儿童的分析]
Pro Fono. 2007 Jan-Apr;19(1):87-96. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872007000100010.
10
Attention, memory, and auditory processing in 10- to 15-year-old children with listening difficulties.10至15岁有听力困难儿童的注意力、记忆力及听觉处理能力
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2308-21. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0226.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral Assessment of Central Auditory Processing in Turner Syndrome.特纳综合征中枢听觉处理的行为评估
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct 6;28(1):e50-e56. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768141. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Abnormal Resting-State Quantitative Electroencephalogram in Children With Central Auditory Processing Disorder: A Pilot Study.中枢听觉处理障碍儿童的异常静息态定量脑电图:一项初步研究。
Front Neurosci. 2018 May 11;12:292. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00292. eCollection 2018.
3
Temporal resolution ability in students with dyslexia and reading and writing disorders.
患有诵读困难及读写障碍的学生的时间分辨能力。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;18(2):146-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363465. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
4
Auditory temporal processing abilities in early azari-persian bilinguals.早期阿扎里 - 波斯语双语者的听觉时间处理能力。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep;25(73):227-32.
5
(Central) auditory processing: the impact of otitis media.(中耳)听觉处理:中耳炎的影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul;68(7):954-9. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)11.
6
Temporal resolution: assessment procedures and parameters for school-aged children.时间分辨率:学龄儿童的评估程序和参数。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May-Jun;79(3):317-24. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130057.
7
Acoustic stimulation effect on temporal processing skills in elderly subjects before and after hearing aid fitting.助听前后老年受试者时间处理技能的声刺激效应。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul-Aug;78(4):9-16. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942012000400004.