PUCRS School of Medicine, Centro de Pesquisa em Oncologia, Jardim Botanico, Porto Alegre, RS, 90610-000, Brazil.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 May;121(1):121-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) (1,000 mg/m(2) in patients >65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.
这项多中心、随机、开放标签的 III 期试验(计划入组 700 例患者)旨在检验单药舒尼替尼是否能改善无进展生存期(PFS),与卡培他滨治疗晚期乳腺癌(ABC)相比。HER2 阴性 ABC 患者在接受蒽环类和紫杉烷治疗后复发,按 1:1 比例随机(双盲)分为舒尼替尼 37.5 mg/天或卡培他滨 1250 mg/m2(>65 岁患者为 1000 mg/m2),每天 1-14 天,每 3 周 2 次。独立数据监测委员会(DMC)在第一次中期分析(舒尼替尼组 238 例,卡培他滨组 244 例)中确定,由于主要终点未达到预期,试验应提前终止。没有统计学证据支持舒尼替尼改善 PFS 优于卡培他滨的假设(单侧 P = 0.999)。数据表明,舒尼替尼的 PFS 短于卡培他滨(中位数分别为 2.8 个月和 4.2 个月;HR,1.47;95%CI,1.16-1.87;双侧 P = 0.002)。中位总生存期(15.3 个月与 24.6 个月;HR,1.17;双侧 P = 0.350)和客观缓解率(11%与 16%;比值比,0.65;P = 0.109)均低于舒尼替尼与卡培他滨。虽然没有报告新的或意外的安全性发现,但与卡培他滨相比,舒尼替尼治疗与更高频率和更大严重程度的许多常见不良事件(AE)相关,导致更多的 AE 导致舒尼替尼暂时停药(66 例与 51 例)。舒尼替尼的相对剂量强度低于卡培他滨(73%与 95%)。基于这些疗效和安全性结果,舒尼替尼不应作为晚期乳腺癌患者的单一疗法。