Faculty of Chemistry, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
J Comput Chem. 2010 Oct;31(13):2371-80. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21530.
DFT(B3LYP) studies on first protonation step of a series of Cu(II) complexes of some tripodal tetraamines with general formula N[(CH(2))(n)NH(2)][(CH(2))(m)NH(2)][(CH(2))(p)NH(2)] (n = m = p = 2, tren; n = 3, m = p = 2, pee; n = m = 3, p = 2, ppe; n = m = 3, tpt; n = 2, m = 3, p = 4, epb; and n = m = 3, p = 4; ppb) are reported. First, the gas-phase proton macroaffinity of all latter complexes was calculated with considering following simple reaction: Cu(L)(g) + H(+)(g) --> Cu(HL)(g). The results showed that there is a good correlation between the calculated proton macroaffinities of all complexes with their stability constants in solution. Then, we tried to determine the possible reliable structures for microspecies involved in protonation process of above complexes. The results showed that, similar to the solid state, the Cu(L)(H(2)O) and Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2) are most stable species for latter complexes and their protonated form, respectively, at gas phase. We found that there are acceptable correlations between the formation constants of above complexes with both the -Delta E and -Delta G of following reaction: Cu(L)(H(2)O)(g) + H(+)(g) + H(2)O(g) --> Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2)(g). The -Delta E of the latter reaction can be defined as a theoretically solvent-proton macroaffinity of reactant complexes because they have gained one proton and one molecule of the solvent. The unknown formation constant of Cu(epb) complex was also predicted from the observed correlations. In addition, the first proton affinity of all complexes was studied in solution using DPCM and CPCM methods. It was shown that there is an acceptable correlation between the solvent-proton affinities of Cu(L)(H(2)O) complexes with formation constants of Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2) complexes in solution.
DFT(B3LYP)研究了一系列具有通式 N[(CH(2))(n)NH(2)][(CH(2))(m)NH(2)][(CH(2))(p)NH(2)](n = m = p = 2,tren;n = 3,m = p = 2,pee;n = m = 3,p = 2,ppe;n = m = 3,tpt;n = 2,m = 3,p = 4,epb;n = m = 3,p = 4,ppb)的 Cu(II)配合物的第一个质子化步骤。首先,考虑以下简单反应,计算了所有后续配合物的气相质子宏观亲和力:[Cu(L)](2+)(g)+ H(+)(g)→[Cu(HL)](3+)(g)。结果表明,所有配合物的计算质子宏观亲和力与它们在溶液中的稳定常数之间存在很好的相关性。然后,我们试图确定质子化过程中涉及的微物种的可能可靠结构。结果表明,类似于固态,[Cu(L)(H(2)O)](2+)和[Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2)](3+)是后者配合物及其质子化形式的最稳定物种,分别为气相。我们发现,对于上述配合物,其形成常数与以下反应的-ΔE 和-ΔG 之间存在可接受的相关性:[Cu(L)(H(2)O)](2+)(g)+ H(+)(g)+ H(2)O(g)→[Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2)](3+)(g)。该反应的-ΔE 可以定义为反应物配合物的理论溶剂质子宏观亲和力,因为它们获得了一个质子和一个溶剂分子。还从观察到的相关性中预测了[Cu(epb)](2+)配合物的未知形成常数。此外,使用 DPCM 和 CPCM 方法在溶液中研究了所有配合物的第一质子亲和力。结果表明,[Cu(L)(H(2)O)](2+)配合物的溶剂质子亲和力与溶液中[Cu(HL)(H(2)O)(2)](3+)配合物的形成常数之间存在可接受的相关性。