Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611-3008, USA.
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.052. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
To assess the utility of recalled American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) scores 6 months after an initial outpatient clinic visit. The AUA-SI is a validated questionnaire used to assess a patient's lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) over a 4-week period. However, patient recall of their LUTS at greater time points is currently unknown.
Between May 2007 and August 2008, 98 patients completed the AUA-SI questionnaire at their initial visit ("Past"). At 6-month follow-up, patients recalled their AUA-SI and quality of life (QoL) scores ("Recall"). As a reference, patients also reported their current symptom scores ("Present"). Descriptive statistics, correlations, regression models, and kappa statistics were performed to assess the associations between the "Past" and "Recall" symptom scores as either categorical (mild, moderate, severe) or continuous (0-35 points) variables. Similar analyses were performed for QoL scores.
Analyses indicated significant correlations between the "Recall" and "Past" AUA-SI and QoL scores. Although 70% of patients remained in the same categorical groupings, 62% of patients had clinically significant differences (>or= 3 points) between "Recall" and "Past" scores. Approximately, 80% of patients recalled their QoL score accurately (<or= 1 point).
In an outpatient setting, only approximately one-third of patients can accurately recall AUA-SI scores as a continuous variable from 6 months prior. However, when used as a categorical variable, "Recall" scores may provide some insight into a patient's "Past" urinary symptoms. Future validation in other populations is required.
评估初始门诊就诊后 6 个月时回忆的美国泌尿外科学会症状指数(AUA-SI)评分的效用。AUA-SI 是一种经过验证的问卷,用于评估患者在 4 周内的下尿路症状(LUTS)。然而,目前尚不清楚患者在更长时间点回忆其 LUTS 的情况。
在 2007 年 5 月至 2008 年 8 月期间,98 例患者在初次就诊时完成了 AUA-SI 问卷(“过去”)。在 6 个月的随访中,患者回忆了他们的 AUA-SI 和生活质量(QoL)评分(“回忆”)。作为参考,患者还报告了他们当前的症状评分(“现在”)。使用描述性统计、相关性、回归模型和 Kappa 统计分析来评估“过去”和“回忆”症状评分作为分类(轻度、中度、重度)或连续(0-35 分)变量之间的关联。对 QoL 评分也进行了类似的分析。
分析表明,“回忆”和“过去”AUA-SI 和 QoL 评分之间存在显著相关性。尽管 70%的患者仍处于相同的分类分组中,但 62%的患者在“回忆”和“过去”评分之间存在临床显著差异(>或=3 分)。大约 80%的患者准确回忆了他们的 QoL 评分(<或=1 分)。
在门诊环境中,只有大约三分之一的患者可以准确回忆起 6 个月前的 AUA-SI 评分作为连续变量。然而,当用作分类变量时,“回忆”评分可能可以提供一些关于患者“过去”尿路症状的信息。需要在其他人群中进行进一步验证。