Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Turkey.
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 May;34(5):345-53. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.013. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
To develop an instrument which could assess the extent to which emotionally maltreating parental behavior was recognized by Turkish parents (Study 1) and to evaluate a group of parental and family characteristics that were related with their recognition of emotional maltreatment (Study 2).
Self-administered instruments were used in both studies. In Study 1, a representative sample consisting of a total of 498 parents of children attending public and private preschools, elementary, and high schools in Ankara, were recruited. A 21-item Recognition of Emotional Maltreatment Scale (REMS) was developed. In addition to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed and convergent validity was examined by utilizing the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI) and the Parental Acceptance Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ). Its test-retest reliability and internal consistency were also investigated. In Study 2, a total of 296 parents who were various public and private sector office workers and maintenance employees were recruited. Parents completed a socio-demographic form and the REMS.
In Study 1, exploratory factor analyses revealed four factors. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor model met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit. A moderate correlation of the REMS with CAPI and PARQ (r=.40 and .44, respectively) supported its convergent validity. Its test-retest stability was .73 and internal consistency was .70. In Study 2, a three-way analysis of variance showed that gender of the parent, family income and parent education were significant. Correlation analyses showed that there were significant negative correlations of mean REMS scores with parental age (r=-.27; p<.0001) and positive correlations with number of children in the family (r=.20; p<.007). Mothers who were housewives had higher mean REMS scores than employed mothers.
The REMS had acceptable validity and reliability properties. Fathers, parents with lower income and lower education levels showed lesser recognition of child emotional maltreatment. Maternal unemployment, younger parent age and more children in the family were related with lower levels of recognition.
This is the initial effort in developing an instrument that may guide professionals in the selection and assessment of at-risk parent groups which need educational programs regarding child emotional maltreatment.
开发一种工具,以评估土耳其父母对情感虐待父母行为的认知程度(研究 1),并评估与他们对情感虐待的认知相关的一组父母和家庭特征(研究 2)。
在这两项研究中都使用了自我管理工具。在研究 1 中,从安卡拉的公立和私立幼儿园、小学和高中招募了一个由 498 名儿童父母组成的代表性样本。开发了一个 21 项的情感虐待识别量表(REMS)。除了进行探索性和验证性因素分析外,还利用儿童虐待倾向量表(CAPI)和父母接受拒绝问卷(PARQ)来检验其聚合效度。还研究了其重测信度和内部一致性。在研究 2 中,总共招募了 296 名来自不同公共和私营部门办公室工作者和维修人员的父母。父母完成了一份社会人口学表格和 REMS。
在研究 1 中,探索性因素分析显示出四个因素。验证性因素分析表明,四因素模型符合适当拟合标准。REMS 与 CAPI 和 PARQ 的中度相关(r=.40 和.44)支持其聚合效度。其重测稳定性为.73,内部一致性为.70。在研究 2 中,三向方差分析表明,父母的性别、家庭收入和父母教育程度具有显著性。相关分析表明,REMS 平均分数与父母年龄呈显著负相关(r=-.27;p<.0001),与家庭中孩子的数量呈显著正相关(r=.20;p<.007)。家庭主妇母亲的 REMS 平均分数高于就业母亲。
REMS 具有可接受的有效性和可靠性。父亲、收入较低和教育程度较低的父母对儿童情感虐待的认识较少。母亲失业、父母年龄较小和家庭中孩子较多与较低的认知水平有关。
这是开发一种工具的初步尝试,该工具可以指导专业人员选择和评估需要有关儿童情感虐待教育计划的高危父母群体。