Department of Vascular Investigations, University Hospital Angers, Angers Cedex, France.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):863-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.044.
The predefined duration to arbitrarily stop the tests during constant-load treadmill exercise is a subject of debate and widely variable in the literature. We hypothesized that the upper and lower limits for predefined durations of constant-load 3.2 km/hour 10% grade tests could be derived from the distribution of walking distances observed on a treadmill in a population of subjects referred for claudication or from the optimal cutoff point distance on a treadmill to confirm a limitation self-reported by history.
We conducted a retrospective analysis using a referral center, institutional practice, and ambulatory patients. We studied 1290 patients (86% male), 62.1 +/- 11.2 years of age, 169 +/- 8 cm height, 75.7 +/- 14.2 kg weight. Patients performed a standard constant-load treadmill test: 3.2 km hour(-1), 10% slope, maximized to 1000 meters (approximately 20 minutes). We analyzed the maximal walking distance self-reported (MWD(SR)) by history and the maximal walking distance measured on the treadmill (MWD(TT)). Patients reporting MWD(SR) >or=1000 meters were considered unlimited by history.
Only 197 patients (15.3%) completed the 20-minute treadmill test. Among the 504 patients who did not stop before 250 meters, 47.8% stopped within the next 250 meters (were unable to walk 500 meters). This proportion falls to 7.5% among the 213 patients who did not stop before 750 meters. When the final goal was to estimate whether the treadmill test can discriminate patients with or without limitation by history, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.809 +/- 0.016 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.778-0.841; P < .0001), the best diagnostic performance was attained for an MWD(TT) of 299 meters (approximately 6.15 minutes).
In patients undergoing constant-load treadmill exercise with a protocol of 3.2 km hour(-1) and 10% slope: a predefined duration of 7 minutes could be proposed as a lower limit for the predefined duration of the tests specifically if one aims at confirming the limitation by history with treadmill testing. Owing to the low risk that patients that could walk 750 meters (approximately 15 minutes) will have to stop in the next 250 meters, 15 minutes seems a reasonable upper limit for the predefined test duration in clinical routine.
在恒负荷跑步机运动中任意停止测试的预设持续时间是一个有争议的话题,在文献中也有很大的差异。我们假设,恒定负荷 3.2 公里/小时 10%坡度测试的预设持续时间的上限和下限可以从参考人群在跑步机上观察到的步行距离分布中得出,也可以从跑步机上确认由病史报告的限制的最佳截止点距离中得出。
我们使用转诊中心、机构实践和门诊患者进行了回顾性分析。我们研究了 1290 名患者(86%为男性),年龄 62.1 ± 11.2 岁,身高 169 ± 8 厘米,体重 75.7 ± 14.2 公斤。患者进行标准的恒负荷跑步机测试:3.2 公里/小时(-1),10%坡度,最大 1000 米(大约 20 分钟)。我们分析了通过病史报告的最大步行距离(MWD(SR))和在跑步机上测量的最大步行距离(MWD(TT))。报告 MWD(SR)≥1000 米的患者被认为是由病史限制的。
只有 197 名患者(15.3%)完成了 20 分钟的跑步机测试。在 504 名未在 250 米前停止的患者中,47.8%在接下来的 250 米内停止(无法走 500 米)。在未在 750 米前停止的 213 名患者中,这一比例降至 7.5%。当最终目标是估计跑步机测试是否可以通过病史来区分有或无限制的患者时,接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为 0.809 ± 0.016(95%置信区间 [CI],0.778-0.841;P<0.0001),最佳诊断性能出现在 MWD(TT)为 299 米(大约 6.15 分钟)时。
在进行 3.2 公里/小时(-1)和 10%坡度的恒负荷跑步机运动的患者中:如果目的是通过跑步机测试来确认病史限制,可以提出 7 分钟作为测试预设持续时间的下限。由于能够走 750 米(大约 15 分钟)的患者在下一个 250 米处停止的风险较低,因此 15 分钟似乎是临床常规中预设测试持续时间的合理上限。