为原告律师审查医疗事故案件：异端邪说还是责任所在。

Reviewing medical malpractice cases for a plaintiff's attorney: heresy or responsibility.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):1054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.081.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.081

PMID:20347705

Abstract

Many physicians refuse to provide an expert review of a medical malpractice case for a plaintiff's attorney. They consider it to be "sleeping with the enemy". However, one method of avoiding frivolous suits is for reputable vascular surgeons to provide an honest and thorough review of the care provided to a patient by another vascular surgeon. This article discusses the importance and some guidelines for providing these reviews.

摘要

许多医生拒绝为原告律师提供医疗事故案件的专家审查。他们认为这是“与敌人同眠”。然而，避免轻率诉讼的一种方法是让有声誉的血管外科医生对另一位血管外科医生为患者提供的护理进行诚实和彻底的审查。本文讨论了提供这些审查的重要性和一些指导原则。