DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 May;36(5):715-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167210366306. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
Religious fundamentalism has been consistently linked to prejudice toward a variety of outgroups. This article proposes that this is partially the case because fundamentalist ideology provides a sense of consistency and closure. Outgroups that challenge the epistemic certainty that fundamentalism provides are rejected in an effort to protect this certainty. Results from two studies, including one using a nationally representative sample, found that the need for closure was related to fundamentalism and partially mediated the relationship between fundamentalism and the derogation of lesbians and gays (Study 1) and value violators in general (Study 2). Furthermore, in Study 2, it was found that only some aspects of the need for closure explain the fundamentalism-prejudice relationship. Results are discussed in relation to past need for closure and ideology research as well as what this means for the study of fundamentalism.
宗教原教旨主义一直与对各种群体的偏见有关。本文提出,这在一定程度上是因为原教旨主义意识形态提供了一种一致性和封闭性。那些挑战原教旨主义提供的认知确定性的群体被拒绝,以努力保护这种确定性。两项研究的结果,包括一项使用全国代表性样本的研究,发现封闭性需求与原教旨主义有关,并部分中介了原教旨主义与贬低男女同性恋者(研究 1)和一般价值观违反者(研究 2)之间的关系。此外,在研究 2 中,发现只有封闭性需求的某些方面可以解释原教旨主义与偏见的关系。研究结果与过去的封闭性需求和意识形态研究以及这对原教旨主义研究的意义有关。