J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jan;112(1):159. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000133.
Reports an error in "People Both High and Low on Religious Fundamentalism Are Prejudiced Toward Dissimilar Groups" by Mark J. Brandt and Daryl R. Van Tongeren (, Advanced Online Publication, Nov 2, 2015, np). In the article, the sample size of = 5,806 in the abstract is incorrect. The correct sample size is = 6,047. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-49839-001.) Research linking religion to prejudice suggests that highly religious individuals, and religious fundamentalists specifically, may be especially susceptible to expressing prejudice toward dissimilar others, whereas people who are less religious and fundamentalist do not show the same effect. The selective prejudice hypothesis predicts that this pattern of results occurs because the cognitive and motivational styles or particular values associated with fundamentalism exacerbate prejudice. In 3 studies, using 4 data sets (N = 5,806), we test this selective prejudice hypothesis against the religious values conflict hypothesis, which predicts that both people with high and low levels of fundamentalism will be prejudiced toward those with dissimilar beliefs to protect the validity and vitality of people's belief systems. Consistent with the religious values conflict hypothesis, we found that people both high and low in fundamentalism were prejudiced toward dissimilar others (Study 1) and these differences were primarily due to differences in the content of religious belief rather than the style of belief (Study 2). In Study 3, we expanded these findings to additional measures of prejudice, found that multiple measures of threat were potential mediators, and explored the possibility of an integrative perspective. In total, these results suggest that people with both relatively high and low levels of fundamentalism are susceptible to prejudice and in some cases the size of this religious intergroup bias may be higher among people with high levels of fundamentalism. (PsycINFO Database Record
马克·J·布兰特（Mark J. Brandt）和达里尔·R·范·通伦（Daryl R. Van Tongeren）所著的《宗教原教旨主义程度高和低的人都对不同群体有偏见》（People Both High and Low on Religious Fundamentalism Are Prejudiced Toward Dissimilar Groups）存在一处错误（，高级在线出版物，2015年11月2日，无页码）。在该文章中，摘要里样本量(N = 5,806)是错误的。正确的样本量是(N = 6,047)。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2015 - 49839 - 001中。）将宗教与偏见联系起来的研究表明，宗教虔诚度高的人，尤其是宗教原教旨主义者，可能特别容易对不同的他人表达偏见，而宗教虔诚度较低和原教旨主义程度较低的人则没有表现出同样的影响。选择性偏见假说预测这种结果模式的出现是因为与原教旨主义相关的认知和动机风格或特定价值观加剧了偏见。在3项研究中，使用4个数据集（(N = 5,806)），我们针对宗教价值观冲突假说检验了这种选择性偏见假说，该假说预测原教旨主义程度高和低的人都会对信仰不同的人有偏见，以保护人们信仰体系的有效性和活力。与宗教价值观冲突假说一致，我们发现原教旨主义程度高和低的人都对不同的他人有偏见（研究1），并且这些差异主要是由于宗教信仰内容的不同而非信仰风格的不同（研究2）。在研究3中，我们将这些发现扩展到更多的偏见测量指标，发现多种威胁测量指标是潜在的中介因素，并探讨了综合视角的可能性。总体而言，这些结果表明原教旨主义程度相对高和低的人都容易产生偏见，在某些情况下，这种宗教群体间偏见的程度在原教旨主义程度高的人当中可能更高。（《心理学文摘数据库记录》
