Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois, 606 East Healey Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2010 Jan;20(1):234-41. doi: 10.1890/09-0059.1.
Nest predators can adversely affect the viability of songbird populations, and their impact is exacerbated in fragmented habitats. Despite substantial research on this predator-prey interaction, however, almost all of the focus has been on the birds rather than their nest predators, thereby limiting our understanding of the factors that bring predators and nests into contact. We used radiotelemetry to document the activity of two snake species (rat snakes, Elaphe obsoleta; racers, Coluber constrictor) known to prey on nests in Midwestern bird communities and simultaneously monitored 300 songbird nests and tested the hypothesis that predation risk should increase for nests when snakes were more active and in edge habitat preferred by both snake species. Predation risk increased when rat snakes were more active, for all nests combined and for two of the six bird species for which we had sufficient nests to allow separate analyses. This result is consistent with rat snakes being more important nest predators than racers. We found no evidence, however, that nests closer to forest edges were at greater risk. These results are generally consistent with the one previous study that investigated rat snakes and nest predation simultaneously. The seemingly paradoxical failure to find higher predation risk in the snakes' preferred habitat (i.e., edge) might be explained by the snakes using edges at least in part for non-foraging activities. We propose that higher nest predation in fragmented habitats (at least that attributable to snakes) results indirectly from edges promoting larger snake populations, rather than from edges directly increasing the risk of nest predation by snakes. If so, the notion of edges per se functioning as ecological "traps" merits further study.
巢捕食者会对鸣禽种群的生存能力产生不利影响,而在破碎化的栖息地中,它们的影响会加剧。然而,尽管对这种捕食者-猎物相互作用进行了大量研究,但几乎所有的研究都集中在鸟类上,而不是它们的巢捕食者上,从而限制了我们对将捕食者和巢穴联系在一起的因素的理解。我们使用无线电遥测技术记录了两种已知捕食巢穴的蛇类(鼠蛇,Elaphe obsoleta;束带蛇,Coluber constrictor)的活动,这些蛇类在中西部鸟类群落中捕食巢穴,同时监测了 300 个鸣禽巢穴,并测试了以下假设:当蛇类活动增加且处于两种蛇类都偏好的边缘生境时,巢穴的捕食风险应该会增加。当鼠蛇活动增加时,所有巢穴的捕食风险都会增加,对于我们有足够巢穴进行单独分析的六种鸟类中的两种也是如此。这一结果与鼠蛇比束带蛇更重要的巢捕食者相一致。然而,我们没有发现证据表明靠近森林边缘的巢穴面临更大的风险。这些结果与之前一项同时研究鼠蛇和巢捕食的研究大致一致。似乎没有发现捕食风险在蛇类偏好的栖息地(即边缘)更高的矛盾结果,可能是因为蛇类至少部分地将边缘用于非觅食活动。我们提出,在破碎化的栖息地中(至少归因于蛇类的),更高的巢捕食率间接来自于边缘促进了更大的蛇类种群,而不是边缘直接增加了蛇类对巢捕食的风险。如果是这样,那么边缘本身作为生态“陷阱”的概念值得进一步研究。