Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois 1102 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, Illinois, 61801.
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois 1102 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, Illinois, 61801 ; Engineer Research and Development Center Champaign, IL.
Ecol Evol. 2014 May;4(9):1589-600. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1049. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
1 Anthropogenic alteration of landscapes can affect avian nest success by influencing the abundance, distribution, and behavior of predators. Understanding avian nest predation risk necessitates understanding how landscapes affect predator distribution and behavior. 2 From a sample of 463 nests of 17 songbird species, we evaluated how landscape features (distance to forest edge, unpaved roads, and power lines) influenced daily nest survival. We also used video cameras to identify nest predators at 137 nest predation events and evaluated how landscape features influenced predator identity. Finally, we determined the abundance and distribution of several of the principal predators using surveys and radiotelemetry. 3 Distance to power lines was the best predictor of predator identity: predation by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), corvids (Corvus sp. and Cyanocitta cristata), racers (Coluber constrictor), and coachwhips (Masticophis flagellum) increased with proximity to power lines, whereas predation by rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta) and raptors decreased. In some cases, predator density may reliably indicate nest predation risk because racers, corvids, and cowbirds frequently used power line right-of-ways. 4 Of five bird species with enough nests to analyze individually, daily nest survival of only indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea) decreased with proximity to power lines, despite predation by most predators at our site being positively associated with power lines. For all nesting species combined, distance to unpaved road was the model that most influenced daily nest survival. This pattern is likely a consequence of rat snakes, the locally dominant nest predator (28% of predation events), rarely using power lines and associated areas. Instead, rat snakes were frequently associated with road edges, indicating that not all edges are functionally similar. 5 Our results suggest that interactions between predators and landscape features are likely to be specific to both the local predators and landscape. Thus, predicting how anthropogenic changes to landscapes affect nesting birds requires that we know more about how landscape changes affect the behavior of nest predators and which nest predators are locally important.
1 人类对景观的改变会影响鸟类筑巢的成功率,因为这会影响捕食者的数量、分布和行为。要了解鸟类筑巢的捕食风险,就必须了解景观如何影响捕食者的分布和行为。 2 在对 17 种鸣禽的 463 个鸟巢进行抽样调查后,我们评估了景观特征(与森林边缘、未铺砌道路和输电线的距离)如何影响每日巢存活率。我们还使用摄像机在 137 起巢捕食事件中识别巢捕食者,并评估了景观特征如何影响捕食者身份。最后,我们通过调查和无线电遥测确定了几种主要捕食者的数量和分布。 3 与输电线的距离是预测捕食者身份的最佳指标:棕头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)、鸦科(Corvus sp. 和 Cyanocitta cristata)、红尾蚺(Coluber constrictor)和鞭蛇(Masticophis flagellum)的捕食率随着与输电线的距离增加而增加,而王锦蛇(Elaphe obsoleta)和猛禽的捕食率则降低。在某些情况下,捕食者的密度可能可靠地指示巢捕食风险,因为红尾蚺、鸦科和牛鹂经常使用输电线的通行权。 4 在有足够巢数可供单独分析的 5 种鸟类中,只有蓝胸鹑(Passerina cyanea)的每日巢存活率随着与输电线的距离而降低,尽管在我们的研究地点,大多数捕食者都与输电线呈正相关。对于所有筑巢物种的综合分析,与未铺砌道路的距离是最能影响每日巢存活率的模型。这种模式可能是由于王锦蛇(本地占主导地位的巢捕食者(28%的捕食事件))很少使用输电线和相关区域的结果。相反,王锦蛇经常与道路边缘相关,这表明并非所有边缘都具有相同的功能。 5 我们的研究结果表明,捕食者与景观特征之间的相互作用很可能与当地捕食者和景观都有关。因此,要预测人类对景观的改变如何影响筑巢鸟类,就需要更多地了解景观变化如何影响巢捕食者的行为以及哪些巢捕食者在当地是重要的。