U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 229 AJM Johnson Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2010 Jan;20(1):278-88. doi: 10.1890/08-2062.1.
While many wildlife species are threatened, some populations have recovered from previous overexploitation, and data linking these population increases with disease dynamics are limited. We present data suggesting that free-ranging elk (Cervus elaphus) are a maintenance host for Brucella abortus in new areas of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Brucellosis seroprevalence in free-ranging elk increased from 0-7% in 1991-1992 to 8-20% in 2006-2007 in four of six herd units around the GYE. These levels of brucellosis are comparable to some herd units where elk are artificially aggregated on supplemental feeding grounds. There are several possible mechanisms for this increase that we evaluated using statistical and population modeling approaches. Simulations of an age-structured population model suggest that the observed levels of seroprevalence are unlikely to be sustained by dispersal from supplemental feeding areas with relatively high seroprevalence or an older age structure. Increases in brucellosis seroprevalence and the total elk population size in areas with feeding grounds have not been statistically detectable. Meanwhile, the rate of seroprevalence increase outside the feeding grounds was related to the population size and density of each herd unit. Therefore, the data suggest that enhanced elk-to-elk transmission in free-ranging populations may be occurring due to larger winter elk aggregations. Elk populations inside and outside of the GYE that traditionally did not maintain brucellosis may now be at risk due to recent population increases. In particular, some neighboring populations of Montana elk were 5-9 times larger in 2007 than in the 1970s, with some aggregations comparable to the Wyoming feeding-ground populations. Addressing the unintended consequences of these increasing populations is complicated by limited hunter access to private lands, which places many ungulate populations out of administrative control. Agency-landowner hunting access partnerships and the protection of large predators are two management strategies that may be used to target high ungulate densities in private refuges and reduce the current and future burden of disease.
虽然许多野生动物物种受到威胁,但有些种群已经从以前的过度开发中恢复过来,将这些种群增加与疾病动态联系起来的数据有限。我们提供的数据表明,在大黄石生态系统(GYE)的新地区,自由放养的麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)是布鲁氏菌流产的维持宿主。在 GYE 周围的六个畜群单位中的四个中,自由放养的麋鹿的布鲁氏菌病血清阳性率从 1991-1992 年的 0-7%增加到 2006-2007 年的 8-20%。这些布鲁氏菌病水平与一些在补充喂养场人为聚集麋鹿的畜群单位相当。我们使用统计和人口建模方法评估了这种增加的几种可能机制。年龄结构人口模型的模拟表明,观察到的血清阳性率水平不太可能通过来自相对高血清阳性率或较老年龄结构的补充喂养区的扩散来维持。在有喂养地的地区,布鲁氏菌病血清阳性率和总麋鹿种群数量的增加在统计学上是不可检测的。与此同时,在没有喂养地的地区,血清阳性率增加的速度与每个畜群单位的种群规模和密度有关。因此,数据表明,由于冬季麋鹿群的聚集增加,自由放养种群中麋鹿之间的传播可能正在增强。由于最近的种群增加,传统上不维持布鲁氏菌病的 GYE 内外的麋鹿种群现在可能面临风险。特别是,2007 年蒙大拿州麋鹿的一些邻域种群比 20 世纪 70 年代大 5-9 倍,有些聚集与怀俄明州喂养地的种群相当。由于猎人对私人土地的有限进入,这些不断增加的种群的意外后果变得复杂,这使得许多有蹄类动物种群不受行政控制。机构-土地所有者狩猎准入伙伴关系和大型捕食者的保护是两种管理策略,可以用于针对私人避难所中的高有蹄类动物密度,并减少当前和未来的疾病负担。