• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建的预测因素。

Predictor of subsequent target lesion revascularization in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ohashi Medical Center, Toho University, 2-17-6 Ohashi Meguro-ku, 153-8515, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2010 May;55(3):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.003
PMID:20350511
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The best way to treat in-stent restenosis (ISR) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate angiographic restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 8 months after intervention in patients with DES-ISR, and to identify predictive factors of subsequent TLR after treatment of DES-ISR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with 105 lesions underwent subsequent intervention for DES-ISR between April 2004 and January 2009. At baseline, focal and diffuse ISR were observed in 76.2% and 23.8%. DES-ISR was treated by five modalities: sirolimus-eluting stent (n=42); paclitaxel-eluting stent (n=24); balloon angioplasty (n=23); cutting balloon angioplasty (n=14); and bare-metal stent (n=2). Angiographic follow-up data were available for 95 lesions (91%). The rates of angiographic restenosis and TLR were 37.9% and 33.3%. Late loss of sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, cutting balloon, and balloon angioplasty were 0.50 mm, 0.49 mm, 0.93 mm, and 1.10 mm. By multivariate analysis, totally occluded ISR (OR 15.43, p=0.0005), diabetes mellitus (OR 3.45, p=0.02), and re-stenting with DES (OR 0.14, p=0.0002) were identified as independent predictors of TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The restenosis rate was significant in this cohort of patients with DES-ISR. Angiographic pattern of DES-ISR and diabetes mellitus are the most important predictors of TLR, whereas re-stenting with DES is protective.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后治疗支架内再狭窄(ISR)的最佳方法仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估 DES-ISR 患者介入治疗后 8 个月的血管造影再狭窄和靶病变血运重建(TLR),并确定 DES-ISR 治疗后发生后续 TLR 的预测因素。

方法和结果

2004 年 4 月至 2009 年 1 月,共有 100 例 105 处病变的患者接受了 DES-ISR 的后续介入治疗。在基线时,观察到 76.2%的局灶性和 23.8%的弥漫性 ISR。DES-ISR 采用 5 种方式治疗:西罗莫司洗脱支架(n=42);紫杉醇洗脱支架(n=24);球囊血管成形术(n=23);切割球囊血管成形术(n=14);和裸金属支架(n=2)。95 处病变(91%)获得了血管造影随访数据。血管造影再狭窄和 TLR 的发生率分别为 37.9%和 33.3%。西罗莫司洗脱支架、紫杉醇洗脱支架、切割球囊和球囊血管成形术的晚期丢失分别为 0.50mm、0.49mm、0.93mm 和 1.10mm。多变量分析显示,完全闭塞的 ISR(OR 15.43,p=0.0005)、糖尿病(OR 3.45,p=0.02)和再用 DES 支架(OR 0.14,p=0.0002)是 TLR 的独立预测因素。

结论

在这组 DES-ISR 患者中,再狭窄率显著。DES-ISR 的血管造影模式和糖尿病是 TLR 的最重要预测因素,而再次用 DES 支架治疗是保护性的。

相似文献

1
Predictor of subsequent target lesion revascularization in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建的预测因素。
J Cardiol. 2010 May;55(3):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
2
Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 15;97(8):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.034. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
3
Clinical outcome of percutaneous treatment of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting stents: results from the first phase of the prospective multicentre German DES.DE registry.药物洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄的临床结果:前瞻性多中心德国 DES.DE 注册研究第一阶段的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Jun;7(2):201-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I2A34.
4
A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients.对1633例连续的中国汉族患者进行的裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架再狭窄的单中心研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Apr 5;119(7):533-8.
5
Drug-eluting stent for the treatment of small coronary lesion: comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent.用于治疗小型冠状动脉病变的药物洗脱支架:西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Apr 5;120(7):569-73.
6
Incidence and predictors of recurrent restenosis following implantation of drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis.药物洗脱支架植入治疗支架内再狭窄后复发性再狭窄的发生率及预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jan;69(1):104-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20908.
7
Randomized trial of optimal treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架置入后支架内再狭窄的最佳治疗策略的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.047.
8
Repeated drug-eluting stent implantation for drug-eluting stent restenosis: the same or a different stent.药物洗脱支架再狭窄的重复药物洗脱支架植入:相同还是不同的支架。
Am Heart J. 2007 Mar;153(3):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.009.
9
Drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusion.药物洗脱支架支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Mar;67(3):344-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20623.
10
Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bare metal stent restenosis.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗金属裸支架再狭窄。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 15;108(4):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.080. Epub 2011 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Derivation and validation of the ISAR score to predict the risk of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention for recurrent drug-eluting stent restenosis.ISAR 评分的推导和验证:用于预测复发性药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者再次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的风险。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Apr 3;18(16):e1328-e1338. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00860.
2
Long-term Outcome following Percutaneous Intervention of Intra-stent Coronary Occlusion and Evaluating the Different Treatment Modalities.冠状动脉支架内闭塞经皮介入治疗后的长期预后及不同治疗方式评估
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 May 31;34:100803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100803. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
The Predictors of Target Lesion Revascularization and Rate of In-Stent Restenosis in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era.
第二代药物洗脱支架时代靶病变血运重建和支架内再狭窄率的预测因素。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;2019:3270132. doi: 10.1155/2019/3270132. eCollection 2019.