Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):355.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.041.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the association between epidural dosing and the risk of uterine rupture in women who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC).
A nested case-control study within a multicenter retrospective cohort of >25,000 women with previous cesarean delivery compared cases of uterine rupture with women without rupture (control subjects) while attempting VBAC with epidural anesthesia. Dose timing, frequency, and quantity were compared. Time-to-event analyses were performed to estimate the association between epidural dosing and risk for uterine rupture while accounting for labor duration.
Of 804 women in the nested case-control study, 504 women (62.7%) had epidural anesthesia, with no statistical difference in epidural usage rates between cases and control subjects (70.4% vs 62.4%; P = .09). Cox-regression analysis revealed a dose-response relationship between the number of epidural doses and uterine rupture risk: 1 dose (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-5.7), 2 doses (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.2-6.2), 3 doses (hazard ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 3.8-12.1), > or =4 doses (hazard ratio, 8.1; 95% CI, 5.4-18.2).
Clinical suspicion for uterine rupture should be high in women who require frequent epidural dosing during a VBAC trial.
本研究旨在评估硬膜外给药剂量与剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)尝试中子宫破裂风险之间的关联。
在一项多中心回顾性队列研究中,对 25000 多名既往剖宫产的女性进行了一项嵌套病例对照研究,将子宫破裂的病例与未破裂的女性(对照组)进行比较,同时比较了硬膜外麻醉下 VBAC 的剂量、频率和数量。进行了时间事件分析,以估计硬膜外给药剂量与子宫破裂风险之间的关联,同时考虑了产程持续时间。
在嵌套的病例对照研究中,有 804 名女性,其中 504 名(62.7%)接受了硬膜外麻醉,病例组和对照组之间硬膜外麻醉使用率没有统计学差异(70.4% vs 62.4%;P=0.09)。Cox 回归分析显示,硬膜外给药次数与子宫破裂风险之间存在剂量反应关系:1 次剂量(危险比,2.8;95%置信区间 [CI],1.4-5.7)、2 次剂量(危险比,3.1;95% CI,2.2-6.2)、3 次剂量(危险比,6.7;95% CI,3.8-12.1)、>或=4 次剂量(危险比,8.1;95% CI,5.4-18.2)。
在 VBAC 试验中需要频繁硬膜外给药的女性,应高度怀疑子宫破裂。