University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Eleanor and Joseph Kosow Diabetes Treatment Center, Diabetes Research Institute, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Endocr Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):588-99. doi: 10.4158/EP09281.OR.
To compare glycemic control with add-on insulin glargine versus pioglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
This 48-week, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label study randomized 389 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin A1c [A1C], 8.0% to 12.0%), despite > or =3 months of sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy, to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone. Outcomes included A1C change from baseline to end point (primary), percentage of patients achieving A1C levels < or =7.0%, and changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, weight, and serum lipids. The safety analysis included incidence of adverse events and rates of hypoglycemia.
At end point, insulin glargine yielded a significantly greater reduction in A1C in comparison with pioglitazone (-2.48% versus -1.86%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -0.93 to -0.31; P = .0001, 48-week modified intent-to-treat population). Insulin glargine also yielded significantly greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose at all time points (end point difference, -34.9 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, -47.6 to -22.2; P<.0001). In comparison with pioglitazone, insulin glargine resulted in a lower overall incidence of possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events (12.0% versus 20.7%) and fewer study discontinuations (2.2% versus 9.1%), but a higher rate (per patient-year) of confirmed clinically relevant hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose <70 mg/dL and all severe hypoglycemia) (4.97 versus 1.04; P<.0001) and severe hypoglycemia (0.07 versus 0.01; P = .0309). Weight and body mass index changes were similar between the 2 treatment groups.
The addition of insulin glargine early in the diabetes treatment paradigm in patients for whom sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy had failed resulted in significantly greater improvements in glycemic control in comparison with the addition of pioglitazone. Although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in patients with insulin glargine therapy, hypoglycemic events occurred in <5% of patients in the insulin glargine treatment group.
比较在 2 型糖尿病患者中,添加胰岛素甘精和吡格列酮治疗的血糖控制效果。
这是一项为期 48 周、多中心、平行组、开放性标签研究,共纳入 389 名血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病成人患者(糖化血红蛋白 [A1C] 8.0%~12.0%),这些患者在接受磺酰脲类药物或二甲双胍单药治疗至少 3 个月后,加用胰岛素甘精或吡格列酮治疗。主要终点是从基线到终点时 A1C 的变化(主要观察指标),达到 A1C 水平<或=7.0%的患者比例,以及空腹血糖、体重指数、体重和血清脂质的基线变化。安全性分析包括不良事件的发生率和低血糖的发生率。
与吡格列酮相比,胰岛素甘精治疗在终点时 A1C 降低更显著(分别为-2.48%和-1.86%;95%置信区间,-0.93 至 -0.31;P=0.0001,48 周修改后的意向治疗人群)。胰岛素甘精在所有时间点的空腹血糖降低也更为显著(终点差值,-34.9mg/dL;95%置信区间,-47.6 至 -22.2;P<.0001)。与吡格列酮相比,胰岛素甘精导致的总体不良事件发生率(可能与治疗相关的不良事件发生率)更低(12.0%比 20.7%),研究停药率更低(2.2%比 9.1%),但低血糖(血糖<70mg/dL 和所有严重低血糖)的确认临床相关不良事件(每患者-年)发生率更高(4.97 比 1.04;P<.0001),严重低血糖的发生率也更高(0.07 比 0.01;P=0.0309)。两组体重和体重指数的变化相似。
在磺酰脲类药物或二甲双胍单药治疗失败的患者中,早期添加胰岛素甘精治疗可显著改善血糖控制,与添加吡格列酮相比效果更优。虽然胰岛素甘精治疗患者发生严重低血糖的频率更高,但低血糖事件在胰岛素甘精治疗组中<5%的患者中发生。