Nkoy Flory L, Wolfe Doug, Hales Joseph W, Lattin Gena, Rackham Maryann, Maloney Christopher G
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT and.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:476-80.
Information technology can improve healthcare efficiency. We developed and implemented a simple and inexpensive tool, the "Automated Case Finding and Alerting System" (ACAS), using data from an existing clinical information system to facilitate identification of potentially eligible patients for clinical trials and patient encounters for billing purposes. We validated the ACAS by calculating the level of agreement in patient identification with data generated from manual identification methods. There was substantial agreement between the two methods both for clinical trial (kappa:0.84) and billing (kappa:0.97). Automated identification occurred instantaneously vs. about 2 hours/day for clinical trial and 1 hour 10 minutes/day for billing, and was inexpensive ($98.95, one time fee) compared to manual identification ($1,200/month for clinical trial and $670/month for billing). Automated identification was more efficient and cost-effective than manual identification methods. Repurposing clinical information beyond their traditional use has the potential to improve efficiency and decrease healthcare cost.
信息技术可以提高医疗保健效率。我们开发并实施了一种简单且成本低廉的工具,即“自动病例查找与警报系统”(ACAS),它利用现有临床信息系统中的数据,以方便识别可能符合临床试验条件的患者以及用于计费目的的患者诊疗记录。我们通过计算与手动识别方法生成的数据在患者识别方面的一致性水平,对ACAS进行了验证。两种方法在临床试验(kappa值:0.84)和计费(kappa值:0.97)方面都有很高的一致性。自动识别瞬间即可完成,而临床试验手动识别大约需要每天2小时,计费手动识别需要每天1小时10分钟,并且与手动识别相比成本低廉(98.95美元,一次性费用),临床试验手动识别每月1200美元,计费手动识别每月670美元。自动识别比手动识别方法更高效且更具成本效益。将临床信息用于传统用途之外的目的有提高效率和降低医疗保健成本的潜力。