Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 114 Sansome Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2010 Jun;14(3):590-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9690-3.
Vaginal practices may interfere with the use and/or the effectiveness of female-initiated prevention methods. We investigated whether vaginal practices differed by randomization group in a phase III trial of the diaphragm with lubricant gel (MIRA) in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4925), and if they were associated with consistent use of study methods. At baseline, vaginal practices were commonly reported: vaginal washing (82.77%), wiping (56.47%) and insertion of dry or absorbent materials (20.58%). All three practices decreased during the trial. However, women in the intervention group were significantly more likely to report washing or wiping during follow-up compared to those in the control group. Additionally, washing, wiping, and insertion, were all independently and inversely associated with consistent diaphragm and gel use and with condom use as well, regardless of study arm. A better understanding of the socio-cultural context in which these practices are embedded could improve educational strategies to address these potentially modifiable behaviors, and may benefit future HIV prevention interventions of vaginal methods.
阴道操作可能会干扰女性主导的预防方法的使用和/或效果。我们在撒哈拉以南非洲的隔膜加润滑剂凝胶(MIRA)的 III 期试验(n = 4925)中调查了阴道操作是否因随机分组而有所不同,以及它们是否与研究方法的一致性使用有关。在基线时,常见的阴道操作包括:阴道冲洗(82.77%)、擦拭(56.47%)和插入干燥或吸水性材料(20.58%)。所有这三种操作在试验期间都有所减少。然而,与对照组相比,干预组的女性在随访期间报告冲洗或擦拭的可能性显著更高。此外,无论研究组如何,冲洗、擦拭和插入都与一致性使用隔膜和凝胶以及使用避孕套呈独立且相反的关系。更好地了解这些操作所嵌入的社会文化背景,可以改善教育策略,以解决这些潜在可改变的行为,并可能有益于未来的阴道方法艾滋病预防干预措施。