van der Straten Ariane, Shiboski Stephen, Montgomery Elizabeth T, Moore Jie, De Bruyn Guy, Ramjee Gita, Chidanyika Agnes, Kacanek Deborah, Padian Nancy
RTI international, Women's Global Health Imperative, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Apr 1;50(4):419-26. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181958511.
We examined diaphragm adherence among 2429 women randomized to the intervention arm (diaphragm + gel + condoms) in Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa, a phase III trial of the diaphragm for HIV prevention in Zimbabwe and South Africa.
Women were followed for a median of 7 quarterly visits (range: 1-8 quarterly visits) during which diaphragm adherence was assessed. We conducted trajectory analyses to identify behavioral groups associated with specific diaphragm adherence patterns. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with higher probability of being in a particular trajectory group.
Diaphragm uptake was very high (3.1% never used diaphragms). However, diaphragm adherence was reported at only 49% of visits. Women were clustered into 4 diaphragm adherence groups based on their highest estimated group membership probability: low adherers (31.0%), decreasing adherers (28.9%), increasing adherers (9.3%), and high adherers (30.8%). Women classified as high adherers (as compared with low adherers) were more likely to be older [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 to 1.11] and to report baseline condom adherence (AOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.47 to 2.71). They were less likely to have high-risk behavior (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.71) and to have high-risk partners (AOR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.78). They were most likely to be from the Zimbabwe site (AOR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.89 to 4.20) and least likely to be from the Johannesburg site (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.77).
This analytic approach could help to identify high compliers for enrollment in future HIV prevention trials or the types of participants who may need intensive adherence counseling during follow-up.
在“非洲改善生殖健康方法”研究中,我们对2429名被随机分配到干预组(子宫帽+凝胶+避孕套)的女性进行了子宫帽依从性调查。该研究是在津巴布韦和南非开展的一项关于子宫帽预防艾滋病病毒的III期试验。
对女性进行了为期7次(范围:1 - 8次)的季度随访,在此期间评估子宫帽的依从性。我们进行了轨迹分析,以确定与特定子宫帽依从模式相关的行为组。采用多变量多项逻辑回归来确定与处于特定轨迹组的较高概率相关的基线特征。
子宫帽的使用率非常高(3.1%的女性从未使用过子宫帽)。然而,只有49%的随访报告了子宫帽的依从性。根据最高估计组成员概率,女性被分为4个子宫帽依从组:低依从者(31.0%)、依从性下降者(28.9%)、依从性上升者(9.3%)和高依从者(30.8%)。被归类为高依从者(与低依从者相比)的女性更有可能年龄较大[调整后的优势比(AOR)= 1.09,95%置信区间(CI):1.07至1.11],并报告基线时避孕套的依从性(AOR = 2.00,95% CI:1.47至2.71)。她们进行高风险行为(AOR = 0.51;95% CI:0.37至0.71)和有高风险伴侣(AOR = 0.58;95% CI:0.43至0.78)的可能性较小。她们最有可能来自津巴布韦站点(AOR = 2.82;95% CI:1.89至4.20),最不可能来自约翰内斯堡站点(AOR = 0.51;95% CI:0.37至0.77)。
这种分析方法有助于识别高依从性者,以便纳入未来的艾滋病病毒预防试验,或确定在随访期间可能需要强化依从性咨询的参与者类型。