• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术中微创与经典手术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Clinics, PO Box 10500, 8000 GM Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):200-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7. Epub 2010 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7
PMID:20352383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3008875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For total hip arthroplasty (THA), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) uses a smaller incision and less muscle dissection than the classic approach (CLASS), and may lead to faster rehabilitation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does minimally invasive hip arthroplasty result in superior clinical outcomes?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 consecutive primary noncemented THAs in 120 patients were assigned to one of two groups (MIS or CLASS). The randomization sequence was stratified for two groups of surgeons, ie, those using a posterolateral approach (PL-CLASS or PL-MIS) and those using an anterolateral approach (AL-CLASS or AL-MIS). Length of the incisions was 18 cm for the CLASS procedures. MIS incisions were extended at the skin level to 18 cm at the end of the procedure. The primary end point was the Harris hip score (HHS) at 6 weeks postoperatively. Patient-centered questionnaires were obtained preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 1 year.

RESULTS

For the patients in the MIS group (average 7.8 cm incision length), statistically significant increased mean HHSs were seen compared with the CLASS group at 6 weeks and 1 year. This difference was small and mainly caused by the favorable results of the PL-MIS. In the MIS group, surgical time was longer. A learning curve was observed based on operation time and complication rate. Although not statistically significant, the perioperative complication rate was rather high in the (anterolateral) MIS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimal invasive approach in THA did not show a clinically relevant superior outcome in the first postoperative year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

对于全髋关节置换术(THA),微创手术(MIS)与传统方法(CLASS)相比,采用更小的切口和更少的肌肉解剖,可能导致更快的康复。

问题/目的:微创髋关节置换术是否能带来更好的临床效果?

患者与方法

在这项双盲随机对照试验中,120 名连续的原发性非骨水泥 THA 患者被随机分为两组(MIS 或 CLASS)。随机序列按两组外科医生分层,即使用后外侧入路(PL-CLASS 或 PL-MIS)和使用前外侧入路(AL-CLASS 或 AL-MIS)的外科医生。CLASS 手术的切口长度为 18cm。MIS 切口在皮肤水平处延长至 18cm,在手术结束时。主要终点是术后 6 周的 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)。术前、术后 6 周和 1 年获得患者为中心的问卷。

结果

在 MIS 组(平均切口长度 7.8cm)中,与 CLASS 组相比,术后 6 周和 1 年的 HHS 显著增加。这种差异很小,主要是由于 PL-MIS 的良好结果。在 MIS 组中,手术时间较长。基于手术时间和并发症发生率,观察到学习曲线。尽管没有统计学意义,但(前外侧)MIS 组的围手术期并发症发生率相当高。

结论

THA 的微创入路在术后第一年没有表现出明显的临床优势。

证据水平

一级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da50/3008875/dff2922e893d/11999_2010_1331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da50/3008875/dff2922e893d/11999_2010_1331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da50/3008875/dff2922e893d/11999_2010_1331_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中微创与经典手术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):200-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
2
Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA.微创前路髋关节置换术的结果并不优于微创直接外侧和后外侧髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2603-1.
3
Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.计算机导航微创全髋关节手术与传统全髋关节置换术的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Jan 11;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-4.
4
Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.经皮辅助囊上入路全髋关节置换术与传统后入路全髋关节置换术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Sep 25;12(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0636-6.
5
Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术微创入路与传统前外侧入路的比较:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1428-x. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
6
Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach.传统经臀前外侧入路与双切口入路行初次全髋关节置换术的临床疗效比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):528-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
7
[Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].经后外侧小切口与经典前外侧入路全髋关节置换术的比较
Orthopade. 2006 Jul;35(7):716, 718-22. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0963-5.
8
[Comparison of the effects of total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach].[直接前方入路与保留梨状肌的后外侧入路全髋关节置换术效果比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Apr 18;49(2):214-220.
9
Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.微创全髋关节置换术可改善术后早期结局:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Jun;179(2):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0437-y. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
10
[Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: seven-year results].[全髋关节置换术的微创前外侧手术入路:七年随访结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(2):138-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Which approach of total hip arthroplasty is the best efficacy and least complication?全髋关节置换术的哪种方法疗效最佳且并发症最少?
World J Orthop. 2024 Jan 18;15(1):73-93. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i1.73.
2
Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术手术入路的比较疗效和安全性评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942.
3
Serum biomarkers for the assessment of muscle damage in various surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.已发表的关于微创全髋关节置换术的证据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7 Suppl):55-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.010.
2
Effects of anterolateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score.前外侧微创全髋关节置换术对髋部肌肉力量、步行速度及功能评分的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Dec;22(8):1187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.011.
3
Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study.
血清生物标志物用于评估初次全髋关节置换术不同手术入路中的肌肉损伤:一项比较研究的系统综述。
Int Orthop. 2022 Aug;46(8):1681-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05442-w. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.影响微创全髋关节置换术结局的因素:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 18;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4.
5
MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study.初次全髋关节置换中MINIMA短柄与标准Profemur(TL)柄的比较研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 2;14(4):e23771. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23771. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Ten-year results of a prospective cohort of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty : a concise follow-up of a previous report.大头金属对金属全髋关节置换术前瞻性队列研究的十年结果:对先前报告的简要随访
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jan;3(1):61-67. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0159.R1.
7
Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.脆弱性指数作为成人重建随机临床试验质量的衡量指标:一项系统评价。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct 11;11:239-251. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.018. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted total hip arthroplasty versus lateral approach in Total Hip Replacement. A prospective comparative study.经皮辅助全髋关节置换术的囊上入路与全髋关节置换术外侧入路的比较。一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Orthop. 2020 Aug 16;21:406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.003. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
9
Disadvantage during Perioperative Period of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: a Network Meta-Analysis.直接前入路全髋关节置换术围手术期的劣势:一项网络荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 May 11;35(18):e111. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e111.
10
Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术各入路的神经麻痹、脱位及翻修率:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr;105(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00662-y. Epub 2020 May 5.
接受微创和标准切口髋关节置换术患者术后即刻步行能力的比较:一项前瞻性盲法研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.173. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
4
Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.后路微创与传统全髋关节置换术后的早期疼痛缓解及功能。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1153-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940.
5
Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study.微创技术与标准技术进行初次全髋关节置换术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Dec;21(8):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.015.
6
The effect of the "mini" incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position.全髋关节置换术中“小”切口对假体位置的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.011.
7
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.微创全髋关节置换术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Feb;20(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061.
8
A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中的微创技术并不能改善术后早期疗效。一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr;87(4):701-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02645.
9
Posterior exposure of the hip joint.髋关节后路暴露。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950 May;32-B(2):183-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.32B2.183.
10
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision.标准切口与小切口行初次全髋关节置换术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1353-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00001.