• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[关于临床评价中疗效与效果差异的讨论]

[Discussion on differences between efficacy and effectiveness in clinical evaluation].

作者信息

Qing Xue-mei, Liu Bao-yan, Wang Yong-yan

机构信息

Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100070.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;30(1):80-3.

PMID:20353041
Abstract

Both "efficacy" and "effectiveness" are two important concepts in clinical evaluation. In this article, the differences and relationship between the two connotations were expounded, and both the differences between "explanatory randomized controlled trial (ERCT)" and "pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT)", which are respectively corresponding to "efficacy" and "effectiveness", and their application values in different stages in clinical therapeutic effect evaluation were further explored. This study may be a helpful reference for defining research purposes, locating appropriate research stages, and choosing suitable designs at its different stages in the clinical evaluation process of Chinese medicine researches.

摘要

“疗效”和“效果”都是临床评价中的两个重要概念。本文阐述了二者内涵的差异与联系,并进一步探讨了分别与“疗效”和“效果”相对应的“解释性随机对照试验(ERCT)”和“实用性随机对照试验(PRCT)”之间的差异及其在临床疗效评价不同阶段的应用价值。本研究对于中医研究临床评价过程中明确研究目的、定位合适的研究阶段以及在不同阶段选择合适的设计可能具有一定的参考作用。

相似文献

1
[Discussion on differences between efficacy and effectiveness in clinical evaluation].[关于临床评价中疗效与效果差异的讨论]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;30(1):80-3.
2
[Real-world study: a potential new approach to effectiveness evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine interventions].[真实世界研究:一种评估中医干预措施有效性的潜在新方法]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Apr;8(4):301-6. doi: 10.3736/jcim20100401.
3
[Key points of protocol design on clinical therapeutic research of traditional Chinese medicine].[中医临床治疗研究方案设计要点]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;27(2):171-3.
4
[The application of single-arm clinical trials with objective performance criteria in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine].
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;32(12):1589-91.
5
[Modality of combined methods of quantitative and qualitative research in evaluation of therapeutic effects of Chinese medicine].[中医治疗效果评估中定量与定性研究相结合方法的模式]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2011 May;31(5):581-6.
6
[Administration and quality control of large-scale clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine].[中药大规模临床试验的管理与质量控制]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2007 Jan;5(1):1-4. doi: 10.3736/jcim20070101.
7
[Discussion on methods of sample size estimation in conducting clinical reevaluation of postmarketing Chinese medicine].[关于上市后中药临床再评价中样本量估计方法的探讨]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;36(8):1097-102.
8
[General contemplation on causality deduction in appraising clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (continued)].[关于中医临床疗效评价中因果推断的一般思考(续)]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2005 May;25(5):389-91.
9
[Preliminary analysis on the method of efficacy evaluation used in clinical articles issued in Chinese journal of integrated traditional and Western medicine].[《中国中西医结合杂志》发表临床文章中疗效评价方法的初步分析]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2004 Jan;24(1):72-4.
10
[Methodological thoughts on clinical efficacy evaluation with multiple clinical trials].
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2006 Aug;31(16):1384-5.